Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumNYT serves up bland overview of climate change - once a month - as pablum for environmental critics
"At a legendary but secretive laboratory in California, Lockheed Martin is working on a plan that some employees hope might transform the worlds energy system: a practicable type of nuclear fusion.
Some 900 miles to the north, Bill Gates and another Microsoft veteran, Nathan Myhrvold, have poured millions into a company developing a fission reactor that could run on todays nuclear waste.
And on the far side of the world, China has seized on discarded American research to pursue a safer reactor based on an abundant element called thorium."
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/12/science/in-search-of-energy-miracles.html?ref=science&_r=0
Monthly? As my young son remarked after his first bite of broccoli: "Phtheh!"
hatrack
(59,592 posts)Fuck me, but this is so beyond pathetic I don't even know where to begin.
cprise
(8,445 posts)If you feel like discussing their work but there is no critical info on their page (easy to imagine) then don't link to them.
Links are like food to the Internet food chain: search engines and advertisers rank and pay according to how links propagate.
So when you think about pasting a link, consider how it tastes first. "Phtheh!" should mean don't paste the link at all. IMO it is enough to offer a quote and a comment.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)I almost always paste a link, because I expect no one to accept my (or anyone's) facts at face value. I want people to check for themselves.
This was more a commentary on the coverage than the article itself. I don't anticipate a lot of NYT in E/E going forward.