Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:14 AM Mar 2013

Visalia (CA) Beekeepers Reporting 25% Mortality As Almond Season Begins

EDIT

“It was a challenge,” said Pitigliano, explaining that the two commercial beekeepers that have been bringing portable hives to his 40-acre grove for the past 15 years discovered that they had lost about a quarter of their bees before the almond trees started blooming in mid-February.

“That means, for us, we had to scramble around to call many beekeepers to see if they had any extra ones, which cost us 25 percent more,” said Pitigliano, explaining that it cost him an extra $125 an acre in order to get the average of two-and-a-half to three hives per acre he needs to ensure enough bees are there to sufficiently pollinate his grove.

Farmers like Pitigliano need so many honey bees that those living wild here and those raised by California’s commercial beekeepers aren’t nearly enough to pollinate all of the state’s 780,000-plus acres of almond groves, which is why farmers also contract with out-of-state beekeepers. More than 31,000 of the state’s acres of almond groves are in Tulare County.

But this year, they’re having problems meeting the almond industry’s demand for their bees. “We’re having difficulty keeping a lot of our colonies alive. It’s nationwide, but we are part of it,” said Eric Mussen, a University of California, Davis, Cooperative Extension apiculturalist (beekeeper). “It’s spread all over the country, and it’s very difficult to identify what is responsible.”

EDIT

http://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/article/20130330/ROI/303300028/Bee-colony-decline-stings-Tulare-County-almond-growers?nclick_check=1

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Visalia (CA) Beekeepers Reporting 25% Mortality As Almond Season Begins (Original Post) hatrack Mar 2013 OP
This has been bugging me. I keep bees. Robb Mar 2013 #1
A friend of mine is a beekeeper. chervilant Mar 2013 #2
That's a normal annual winter die-off. Robb Mar 2013 #3
So, chervilant Mar 2013 #4
I think the controversy is addressing the wrong issue. Robb Mar 2013 #5
Ahhhh.... kristopher Mar 2013 #6
It's not just commercial bees that are dying out though NickB79 Mar 2013 #7
The rate is not tremendous for wild bees. Robb Mar 2013 #8
Your link looked only at the number of species NickB79 Mar 2013 #9
Look. Your link described the relative abundance of four species. Robb Mar 2013 #10
I live in Fl Mojorabbit Mar 2013 #11
What a bummer! How many supers/deeps? Robb Mar 2013 #12

Robb

(39,665 posts)
1. This has been bugging me. I keep bees.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:36 AM
Mar 2013

That's actually a reasonable percentage of bees to lose. Hear me out.

Commercial keepers never have to over-winter the bees, they can move them north and south with the growing seasons of various orchards. The bees are always producing honey, which is better for the beekeepers (who are in the business of selling honey after all), but the bees never experience winter. That means the weaker bees never die off in winter -- some estimates are as many as 40% of a hive's bees will perish in the cold. Our own experience has been around 30% of the bees die over the winter, but of course so many new ones are born during warmer months it's a sustainable, relatively productive hive.

Until commercial beekeepers, with their artificially large hives, start experiencing a "startling die-off" that even approaches what happens in nature, I'm not going to worry that there's anything more complicated than over-reaching going on.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
2. A friend of mine is a beekeeper.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:46 AM
Mar 2013

She told me that her mentors (who've been beekeepers for more than a decade) lost about 40% of their hives (ENTIRE hives, not 'weak' bees).

The sad part is that they considered this a 'good' outcome, considering their losses from the previous 2-3 years.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
3. That's a normal annual winter die-off.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:48 AM
Mar 2013

Last edited Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:08 AM - Edit history (1)

Do your friend's bees ever experience winter?

Edited to be clear: that number is similar to that experienced in wild and naturally-kept hives.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
4. So,
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:32 AM
Mar 2013

do you think the concerns articulated by these veteran beekeepers (who most assuredly know about 'winter die-offs') are unwarranted? Do you think the growing controversy about loss of honey bees is unwarranted?

BTW, I recently returned to the Ozarks, in time to witness Spring (after an absence of twelve years). I saw flowers blooming weeks earlier than 'normal.' I saw my housemate's pear tree blossoms come and go without the swarm of honey bees we've seen around that tree in years gone by. In fact, I can count on one hand the number of bees I saw in her fallow garden spot, where I walked my dog almost daily. I am concerned, and will remain so, given the fact that two-thirds of our crops are pollinated by bees.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
5. I think the controversy is addressing the wrong issue.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:44 AM
Mar 2013

Changes in climate are undeniable; loss of commercial honeybees are documented. The issue is whether those bees would be dying off in the numbers described were they not already made less robust by commercial beekeeping practice.

Commercial beekeepers feed their bees antibiotics, appetite stimulants, amino acids, fluvalinate, coumaphos and much more; they put out extra pollen, and extra sugar in solution -- all practices that generate more honey. Which is the idea, from their perspective.

But you cannot tell me that beehives that are trucked all over, fed unnatural foodstuffs and medicines, and avoid normal seasonal die-offs are as robust as hives that stay in one place, and grow at a rate commensurate with the availability of natural pollen and nectar.

There are certainly environmental changes at work here; but a robust bee population would adapt to them more readily.

NickB79

(19,246 posts)
7. It's not just commercial bees that are dying out though
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 03:54 PM
Mar 2013

Wild species are disappearing at a tremendous rate as well: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/03/bumble-bee-decline_n_803896.html

The explanations you offer for the loss of commercial colonies cannot be easily extrapolated to explain the native bee losses.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
8. The rate is not tremendous for wild bees.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 04:04 PM
Mar 2013

I recommend a much more recent article: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=hive-and-seek-domestic-honeybees-keep-disappearing

A new paper, published in the Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, offers a ray of hope for native bee species. In this research, Droege and his colleagues compiled a list of 770 species that are historically native to the eastern U.S. They sent this list to a network of bee experts, asking them to note which species they had found within the past 20 years.

The survey revealed that 95 percent of the bee species that lived 150 years ago have not gone extinct. Thirty-seven species were nowhere to be found, but the researchers pointed out that those bees had been rare to begin with and were often subject to taxonomic confusion. The paper offers "a clarification to the 'all pollinators are going to hell' point of view," Droege says.

NickB79

(19,246 posts)
9. Your link looked only at the number of species
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 05:00 PM
Mar 2013

My link was discussing the population sizes of four specific species. While the total number of species appears solid, the number of individuals appears to be falling rapidly.

If I once found 1000 bees from 5 species in my garden, but now find only 10 bees from those 5 same species, I couldn't say they were in good shape.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
10. Look. Your link described the relative abundance of four species.
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 06:12 PM
Mar 2013

Bombus occidentalis, B. pensylvanicus, B. affinis and B. terricola. There are more than 30 species of bombus (bumblebee), and several hundred species of bee (800 IIRC).

But -- and this is important -- relative abundance of a species is not the same as the total numbers of bees. "Relative abundance" means, if you gather 1,000 bees, how many of them are Species A?

Here's an illustrative excerpt from the study they're talking about (PDF):

In yearly surveys of southern Oregon and northern California sites in which a total of 15,573 bumble bees were observed from 1998 to 2007, 102 B. occidentalis were observed in 1998, nine in 1999, one in 2000, one in 2001, one in 2002, and none in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, or 2007 (Thorp 2008, Figure 9). In 2008, a single B. occidentalis specimen was captured on Mt. Ashland in Oregon in a survey that included over 2,000 bees that were caught in blue vane traps (R. Thorp, personal communication, September 2008).


Occidentalis, Pensylvanicus, Affinis and Terricola are all part of the same subgenus; they are declining in precisely the same way a European species (B. terrestris) has been. And this is almost certainly because -- sort of like the French/Australia syrah/shiraz connection -- we shipped a ton of commercially-bred Occidentalis bees overseas for pollination, where they did great. Europeans bred them too, more cheaply, and we started importing them back.

They returned infected with the same pathogens that are killing off Terrestris. Probably.

While a definitive link between pathogens and declines in these three species has not been made, the close relationship of the declining U.S. bee species to the European bufftailed bumble bee, as well as the timing, speed, and severity of the population crashes, and the fact that other bumble bee species living in the same areas continue to thrive, suggest that an escaped exotic disease organism is the main cause of these widespread losses in members of the subgenus Bombus.


Now, that said:

However, there are a number of other threats that may be contributing to the losses of these bumble bees.

Habitat loss and fragmentation may be playing a role in the decline of these bumble bee species. Habitat alterations which destroy, fragment, degrade, or reduce their food supplies (flowers that produce the nectar and pollen they require), nest sites (e.g. abandoned rodent burrows or undisturbed grass), and hibernation sites for over-wintering queens all can harm these species. Threats that alter bumble bee habitat include agricultural intensification, livestock grazing, urban development, and fragmentation of landscapes. As bumble bee habitats become increasingly fragmented, the size of each population diminishes and inbreeding becomes more prevalent. Inbred populations of bumble bees show decreased genetic diversity and are at a greater risk of decline.

Insecticide applications may threaten populations of bumble bees of the subgenus Bombus. The National Academy of Science National Research Council’s report on the Status of Pollinators in North America notes that bumble bees can be negatively affected
by many pesticides. The report also points out that ground-nesting bumble bees are uniquely susceptible to pesticides that are used on lawns or turf (National Research Council 2007). Insecticide application on Forest Service managed public lands for spruce budworm has been shown to cause massive kills of bumble bees and reduce pollination of nearby commercial blueberries in New Brunswick (reviewed in Kevan and Plowright 1995). Broad-spectrum herbicides used to control weeds can indirectly harm bumble bees by removing the flowers that would otherwise provide the bees with pollen and nectar.

Other factors that may be threatening these bumble bee species include invasive plants and insects, air pollution, and climate change.


My point is, drifting changes in population of particular species are not alarming; a decline in total wild bee population would be extremely alarming.

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
11. I live in Fl
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 03:18 AM
Mar 2013

and we generally don't lose many bees in winter. We hardly had a winter at all this year. I am hearing some reports of big loses. I lost a hive last year where I went out to check them and they were just gone. Super was filled to the brim with honey. It was wild. I think the problem is multifaeted and just comes together as a perfet storm for the bees.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
12. What a bummer! How many supers/deeps?
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 10:53 AM
Mar 2013

Were the dead bees still there, or is there a chance they simply absconded? One of the bee club guys had his first two hives abscond, I'm frankly amazed he stuck it out with a third. They were package queens; he was pretty sure he wasn't adequately ventilating in the summer, because when he did the colony stuck.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Visalia (CA) Beekeepers R...