Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumHuman impacts on natural world underestimated
http://www.ucalgary.ca/news/releases/may2013/ecosystems[font face=Serif][font size=5]Human impacts on natural world underestimated[/font]
[font size=4]New research on human influence in ecosystems set to inform conservation efforts[/font]
May 8, 2013
[font size=3]A comprehensive five-year study by University of Calgary ecologists which included monitoring the activity of wolves, elk, cattle and humans indicates that two accepted principles of how ecosystems naturally operate could be overshadowed by the importance of human activity.
Understanding the significance of the impact that humans have on ecosystems is a critical component in formulating long-term and effective conservation strategies, says principal investigator Marco Musiani.
Our results led us to believe that ecologists have underestimated the impact of humans on natural food chains. The data we collected shows that humans are deliberately or inadvertently engineering ecosystems regardless of whether they would be naturally pre-disposed to top-down or bottom-up effects. Even in protected areas, the influence of humans might be greater than we previously thought.
Ecologists have long debated whether natural ecosystems and associated food chains are primarily regulated by predators or by the productivity of plant species, called top-down and bottom-up effects, respectively. With most of the worlds ecosystems now dominated by humans, researchers from the University of Calgary sought to understand how much people influenced food chains in southwest Alberta.
[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064311[font size=4]New research on human influence in ecosystems set to inform conservation efforts[/font]
May 8, 2013
[font size=3]A comprehensive five-year study by University of Calgary ecologists which included monitoring the activity of wolves, elk, cattle and humans indicates that two accepted principles of how ecosystems naturally operate could be overshadowed by the importance of human activity.
Understanding the significance of the impact that humans have on ecosystems is a critical component in formulating long-term and effective conservation strategies, says principal investigator Marco Musiani.
Our results led us to believe that ecologists have underestimated the impact of humans on natural food chains. The data we collected shows that humans are deliberately or inadvertently engineering ecosystems regardless of whether they would be naturally pre-disposed to top-down or bottom-up effects. Even in protected areas, the influence of humans might be greater than we previously thought.
Ecologists have long debated whether natural ecosystems and associated food chains are primarily regulated by predators or by the productivity of plant species, called top-down and bottom-up effects, respectively. With most of the worlds ecosystems now dominated by humans, researchers from the University of Calgary sought to understand how much people influenced food chains in southwest Alberta.
[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 743 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Human impacts on natural world underestimated (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
May 2013
OP
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)1. Sooner or later the important word will be population.
It's not a matter of if, but when. As uncomfortable as it makes people, it's simply going to happen. I just hope it does before we get another few billion. I'm not hopeful.
pscot
(21,024 posts)2. Over grazing
Nice shot.