Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumDocuments Show Exxon Lied in Aftermath of Tar Sands Pipeline Rupture
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/05/22-6Oil giant knew of dangerous toxins in Arkansas' Lake Conway, yet claimed waterway was oil free
Documents Show Exxon Lied in Aftermath of Tar Sands Pipeline Rupture
- Jon Queally, staff writer
Published on Wednesday, May 22, 2013 by Common Dreams
Internal ExxonMobil documents obtained through an Freedom of Information Act request by Greenpeace shows that the oil giant misled the public about the degree to which the spill of more than 200,000 galllons of tar sands oil in Arkansas had contaminated local waterways.
Following the rupture of the Pegasus pipeline in the town of Mayflower on March 29, area residents were increasingly concerned that Lake Conway had been contaminated. Despite overwhelming evidence that tar sands oil was in the lake, ExxonMobil publicly said this was not the case.
~snip~
A new batch of documents received by Greenpeace in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has revealed that Exxon downplayed the extent of the contamination caused by the ruptured pipeline. Records of emails between Arkansas DEQ and Exxon depict attempts by Exxon to pass off press releases with factually false information. In a draft press release dated April 8, Exxon claims Tests on water samples show Lake Conway and the cove are oil-free. However, internal emails from April 6 show Exxon knew of significant contamination across Lake Conway and the cove resulting from the oil spill.
When the chief of Arkansas Hazardous Waste division called Exxon out on this falsehood, Exxon amended the press release. However, they did not amend it to say that oil was in Lake Conway and contaminant levels in the lake were rising to dangerous levels, as they knew to be the case. Instead, they continue to claim that Lake Conway is oil-free. For the record, Exxon maintains that the cove, a section of Lake Conway that experienced heavy oiling from the spill, is not part of the actual lake. Exxon maintains this distinction in spite of Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel saying unequivocally The cove is part of Lake Conway The water is all part of one body of water. Furthermore, Exxon water tests confirmed that levels of Benzene and other contaminants rose throughout the lake, not just in the cove area.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 696 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Documents Show Exxon Lied in Aftermath of Tar Sands Pipeline Rupture (Original Post)
unhappycamper
May 2013
OP
as long as there is a token fine - cost of doing business - this shit will continue.
HooptieWagon
May 2013
#2
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)1. Did anyone seriously believe them in the first place?
After BP????
Anyone????
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)2. as long as there is a token fine - cost of doing business - this shit will continue.
There needs to be some serious jail time, for this to stop.