Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumElevated carbon dioxide making arid regions greener
http://www.agu.org/news/press/pr_archives/2013/2013-24.shtml31 May 2013
AGU Release No. 13-24
[font size=3]WASHINGTON, DCScientists have long suspected that a flourishing of green foliage around the globe, observed since the early 1980s in satellite data, springs at least in part from the increasing concentration of carbon dioxide in Earths atmosphere. Now, a study of arid regions around the globe finds that a carbon dioxide fertilization effect has, indeed, caused a gradual greening from 1982 to 2010.
Focusing on the southwestern corner of North America, Australias outback, the Middle East, and some parts of Africa, Randall Donohue of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) in Canberra, Australia and his colleagues developed and applied a mathematical model to predict the extent of the carbon-dioxide (CO[font size="1"]2[/font]) fertilization effect. They then tested this prediction by studying satellite imagery and teasing out the influence of carbon dioxide on greening from other factors such as precipitation, air temperature, the amount of light, and land-use changes.
The teams model predicted that foliage would increase by some 5 to 10 percent given the 14 percent increase in atmospheric CO[font size="1"]2[/font] concentration during the study period. The satellite data agreed, showing an 11 percent increase in foliage after adjusting the data for precipitation, yielding strong support for our hypothesis, the team reports.
Lots of papers have shown an average increase in vegetation across the globe, and there is a lot of speculation about whats causing that, said Donohue of CSIROs Land and Water research division, who is lead author of the new study. Up until this point, theyve linked the greening to fairly obvious climatic variables, such as a rise in temperature where it is normally cold or a rise in rainfall where it is normally dry. Lots of those papers speculated about the CO[font size="1"]2[/font] effect, but it has been very difficult to prove.
[/font][/font]
madokie
(51,076 posts)If this is true then taking it further that would suggest that there is more oxygen being produced at the same time, would it not?
Socialistlemur
(770 posts)It's a complicated balancing act. We get co2 and water when we burn fossil fuels (and minor amounts of nasties). The oxygen is used in this process. Then plants grow from water Co2 and minor amounts of key minerals (fertilizers), so we have biomass created. In a sense the fossil fuels become biomass. I can confirm the observations, there was a large increase in vegetation cover but lately it's not happening because the world isn't warming either. Temperatures flattened out about 12 years ago. I just finished reading a report which says a lot of the growth is new forest growing in the far north.
I have to finish reading what I'm reading but it shows some really interesting trends as a result of the warming and increased CO2 levels. In general we will see more humidity, more plant growth (limited by nutrient), a slight increase in temperature and definitely less ice in the Arctic. But the Antarctic will be less impacted. Stay tuned.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)the paper (apparently - I didn't buy it) ignores the effect of increased reactive nitrogen levels worldwide from fertilizers and industrial processes.
80% of applied fertilizer leaches out in groundwater or evaporates into the air - from where, of course, it eventually comes back down to Earth.
Socialistlemur
(770 posts)I don't get your point.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)is a lynchpin of the denier platform, most of whom are associated with the petroleum industry.
http://www.plantsneedco2.org/default.aspx/MenuItemID/73/MenuGroup/AboutUs.htm
Submariner
(12,504 posts)will be the headline in DU's LBN in the year 10,013. DU'ers will be upset about 'desertification' caused by the loss of CO2 in the atmosphere.
You heard it here first. Some DU'er 8,000 years from now will find this post using 'advanced search' and prove me right.