Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 01:15 PM Jun 2013

DOE: electric vehicles 1/3 cheaper to drive, 17% lower lifetime costs



"Just this week I noted a new tool from the US Department of Energy showing that fueling an electric car is about 3 times cheaper than fueling a gasmobile. Well, those fuel savings add up, resulting in more money in your pocket, as a recent study from the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) shows. Here’s more info (and two charts!) from Sophie Vorrath of RenewEconomy:

New analysis from America’s Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has come up with some interesting figures that suggest the number-one obstacle for mass adoption of electric vehicles – prohibitive cost – could be on the way out. Greentech Media reports that the study – which compared the 2012 prices of the fully electric Nissan Leaf (graph 1) and the hybrid plug-in Chevy Volt (graph 2) against comparable petrol-fuelled cars on the market – found the two EVs were within 10 per cent of conventional vehicles.

The study found that petrol prices were one of the major factors affecting this balance, but the bad news – for us in Australia, anyway – is that America’s state and federal EV incentives were an even more important contributing factor, as were capital costs, which are being driven down in the US in what appears to be an electric car price war. Driving habits and maintenance also played a role.


http://theenergycollective.com/zachshahan/237916/electric-cars-much-cheaper-you-think-cheaper-gasmobiles-charts?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=The+Energy+Collective+%28all+posts%29

http://energy.gov/articles/egallon-how-much-cheaper-it-drive-electricity
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
1. Does that include the costs of renting a gas power car when the leaf can't take you all the way to
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 02:50 PM
Jun 2013

Grandma's house? Or Las Vegas?

hunter

(38,321 posts)
2. My kids will tell you a car's no good for getting to grandma and grandpa's house.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 04:30 PM
Jun 2013

You gotta fly or take a boat.

My wife and I wouldn't have to rent a gasoline powered car more than once or twice a year, if that.

In my perfect world most people wouldn't have to own cars, nor would they want to.

Cars destroy the natural environment, they're dangerous, and they smell bad. The "freedom" they give you is a cruel illusion. A driver's license is an internal passport, just like they have in any other authoritarian nation.

hunter

(38,321 posts)
4. I have a beef with automobiles.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 07:20 PM
Jun 2013

The automobile culture was a horrible, horrible mistake.

Autoworkers could just as well be building electric railroads to replace airlines, long haul trucking, and long distance automobile travel. They could be building lightweight, slower, more energy efficient electric cars and public transportation systems for local travel. They could be building solar power and energy storage systems.

We could also start breaking up sprawling suburbs into smaller walkable communities with distinctive shopping and community centers.

There's plenty of work to be done, we simply have to decide we're going to stop using fossil fuels.

But we won't, and things are going to get ugly.

 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
5. there isn't enough work
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 08:17 PM
Jun 2013

consider Detroit.

perfectly usable locations
and homesites are being abandoned.

hunter

(38,321 posts)
8. Plenty of workers, not enough work? How can that be?
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:58 PM
Jun 2013

Oh yeah, we're being screwed over by the very wealthy. They need people who will take their abuse. It's do what they tell you to do or starve.

NickB79

(19,257 posts)
9. Sacrificing the environment for more jobs, are we?
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 11:04 PM
Jun 2013

Oh my, oh my.

You can't expect to keep our car-centered culture and adequately address our numerous environmental issues at the same time, even if we replaced all IC-cars with electrics.

The future lies in mass transit out of sheer necessity, Detroit be damned.

 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
10. if people don't have jobs ...
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 11:12 PM
Jun 2013

they tend to be uncooperative.

especially if cooperation requires
sacrifice.

ask Al Gore to give up
his private jet.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
12. Al has become the poster child for hypocrisy on the left
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 11:29 PM
Jun 2013

and deservedly so.

Taking Al out of the equation - we need to create transportation, energy, and jobs that have nothing to do with fossil fuels, and do it as quickly as possible.

Or accept that humans are incapable of self-preservation.

hunter

(38,321 posts)
7. Flying uses fossil fuels.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:52 PM
Jun 2013

Maybe a sailboat. That's the old fashioned way and not nearly so dangerous as it was thousands of years ago.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
11. In a single car household, in most cases, an IC car still makes the most sense.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 11:12 PM
Jun 2013

Within five years that will change.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»DOE: electric vehicles 1/...