Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumRenewables Continue to Outpace Conservative Global Projections
Renewables Continue to Outpace Conservative Global Projections
The IEA now says renewables will overtake gas by 2016.
STEPHEN LACEY: JULY 1, 2013
The International Energy Agency is out with its latest medium-term outlook for global renewables. And once again, projections for installation and energy production have been revised upward.
According to the IEA's analysis, renewable electricity will surpass output from natural gas and double generation from nuclear by 2016, becoming the second-most important source of electricity behind coal.
Those projections for generation are 90 terawatt-hours higher than last year's medium-term renewable energy market report. The IEA now says that renewable electricity will make up one quarter of gross power generation in 2018, with non-hydro renewables accounting for 8 percent by that date.
Although the IEA has always been outspoken about the need to deploy more low-carbon technologies and address climate change, the organization has been known for its conservative analysis about the future growth of renewables.
For example, in 2003, it projected that non-hydro renewables would only represent 4 percent of global generation by 2030 under an aggressive policy scenario. But the industry hit that threshold in 2011 -- nearly twenty years early....
The IEA now says renewables will overtake gas by 2016.
STEPHEN LACEY: JULY 1, 2013
The International Energy Agency is out with its latest medium-term outlook for global renewables. And once again, projections for installation and energy production have been revised upward.
According to the IEA's analysis, renewable electricity will surpass output from natural gas and double generation from nuclear by 2016, becoming the second-most important source of electricity behind coal.
Those projections for generation are 90 terawatt-hours higher than last year's medium-term renewable energy market report. The IEA now says that renewable electricity will make up one quarter of gross power generation in 2018, with non-hydro renewables accounting for 8 percent by that date.
Although the IEA has always been outspoken about the need to deploy more low-carbon technologies and address climate change, the organization has been known for its conservative analysis about the future growth of renewables.
For example, in 2003, it projected that non-hydro renewables would only represent 4 percent of global generation by 2030 under an aggressive policy scenario. But the industry hit that threshold in 2011 -- nearly twenty years early....
Of course, not all the major govt players are as tied to the past as the EIA.
FERC chair on new nuclear and coal plants: We may not need any, ever.
By Joe Romm on Apr 22, 2009 at 4:36 pm
The chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Jon Wellinghoff, said today of new coal and nuclear plants, We may not need any, ever. Greenwire (subs. reqd) reported his remarks at a U.S. Energy Association forum:
Between energy efficiency and demand response and wind and concentrated solar power (CSP) and biomass and even new hydro (blog post forthcoming) and natural gas all of which Wellinghoff discussed (see below) we certainly have more than enough capacity to deliver as much low carbon and no-carbon power as we need whenever and wherever it is needed: (see Intro to the core climate solutions and If Obama stops dirty coal, as he must, what will replace it? Part 1 and Part 2: An intro to biomass cofiring). And thats not even counting cogeneration/recycled energy and geothermal.
Nuclear is indeed wildly expensive, more expensive than the best solar today (see Exclusive analysis, Part 1: The staggering cost of new nuclear power and The Self-Limiting Future of Nuclear Power.). And new dirty coal is climate destroying and likely to be increasingly viewed as unfinanceable.
Wellinghof is a key climate and clean energy pick by Obama....
By Joe Romm on Apr 22, 2009 at 4:36 pm
The chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Jon Wellinghoff, said today of new coal and nuclear plants, We may not need any, ever. Greenwire (subs. reqd) reported his remarks at a U.S. Energy Association forum:
I think [new nuclear expansion] is kind of a theoretical question, because I dont see anybody building these things, I dont see anybody having one under construction, Wellington said.
Building nuclear plants is cost-prohibitive, he said, adding that the last price he saw was more than $7,000 a kilowatt more expensive than solar energy. Until costs get to some reasonable cost, I dont think anybodys going to [talk] that seriously, he said. Coal plants are sort of in the same boat, theyre not quite as expensive.
Between energy efficiency and demand response and wind and concentrated solar power (CSP) and biomass and even new hydro (blog post forthcoming) and natural gas all of which Wellinghoff discussed (see below) we certainly have more than enough capacity to deliver as much low carbon and no-carbon power as we need whenever and wherever it is needed: (see Intro to the core climate solutions and If Obama stops dirty coal, as he must, what will replace it? Part 1 and Part 2: An intro to biomass cofiring). And thats not even counting cogeneration/recycled energy and geothermal.
Nuclear is indeed wildly expensive, more expensive than the best solar today (see Exclusive analysis, Part 1: The staggering cost of new nuclear power and The Self-Limiting Future of Nuclear Power.). And new dirty coal is climate destroying and likely to be increasingly viewed as unfinanceable.
Wellinghof is a key climate and clean energy pick by Obama....
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2009/04/22/203981/ferc-chair-wellinghoff-nonew-nuclear-and-coal-plants/?mobile=nc
That was from 2009, and in spite of the declining economics of nuclear, in typical 1% fashion there have been a couple of places moving forward with nuclear plants by placing the risk entirely on the ratepayers and the taxpayers (see "construction work in progress" financing and the federal nuclear loan guarantee program).
Win lose or draw, the big glowing guys won't lose on the projects underway.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 752 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Renewables Continue to Outpace Conservative Global Projections (Original Post)
kristopher
Jul 2013
OP
kristopher
(29,798 posts)1. Kick for Nick