Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,630 posts)
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 05:45 AM Jul 2013

'Gasland' scandal ignited at EPA

'Gasland' scandal ignited at EPA
By RON ARNOLD | JULY 11, 2013 AT 6:55 PM

When the anti-fracking hoax-fest "Gasland Part II" premiered on HBO July 8, eco-filmmaker Josh Fox probably wasn't expecting explosive emails to surface exposing his fakery and how the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency colluded with him in a campaign to destroy "fracking," the hydraulic fracturing technology that's making America energy independent.

Here are the facts:

In January, 2011, Josh Fox requested an interview with Dallas, Texas-based EPA regional director Alfredo Armendariz, who told his press secretary:

"It was good working with him for Gasland, and we try to keep in touch every so often. ... Let's propose to him an outdoor interview in FW [Fort Worth, Texas] somewhere, at a place where he can get good background shots."

For Armendariz to play assistant producer on Fox's deceptive shams is not surprising. He came to the EPA from WildEarth Guardians with rabid anti-hydrocarbon allegiances clearly sworn in advance.

This week, Washington Free Beacon's Lachlan Markay filed a story that helped me link the EPA to Fox and a group of his followers. The story explained how Fox, in his 2010 film Gasland, deceptively portrayed longtime natural methane seepage as a product of fracking.

More:
http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2532966

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Gasland' scandal ignited at EPA (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jul 2013 OP
Interesting. Ilsa Jul 2013 #1
so is there a controversy around josh fox that i don't know? xchrom Jul 2013 #2
"Purposeful disfunction" has interesting implications pscot Jul 2013 #5
What a total load of teabagger bullshit Champion Jack Jul 2013 #3
+1 Some people have no shame. nt limpyhobbler Jul 2013 #6
Fucking Examiner. n/t hootinholler Jul 2013 #4

Ilsa

(61,698 posts)
1. Interesting.
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 06:45 AM
Jul 2013

I guess that's why Armendariz is gone from the EPA.

About the author: "Washington Examiner columnist Ron Arnold is executive vice president of the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise." I'm sure he's a drill-baby-drill kind of fellow, no matter what.

I've watched both Gasland 2 and FrackNation. Both are selling a point of view and have something hokey going on. The one thing I would like to see addressed is a number discussed in Gasland 2 about leaking casings. Fox said that Schlumberger's own internal numbers said that 5% of cement well casings were immediately cracked, and 50% would be failing within 30 years. I didn't hear that refuted in FrackNation, or the implications discussed.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
2. so is there a controversy around josh fox that i don't know?
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 07:13 AM
Jul 2013

i have many neighbors and friends who work at the EPA -- all of them have been quite frank about the purposeful dysfunction going on there.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
5. "Purposeful disfunction" has interesting implications
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 10:50 AM
Jul 2013

Maybe you could expand a bit on that topic. It seems like there might be a worthwhile OP there.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»'Gasland' scandal ignited...