Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 04:30 PM Jul 2013

Consumer Watchdog: Keystone XL to raise Midwestern gasoline prices $.20-.40 at the pump



"SANTA MONICA, CA –The Keystone XL pipeline will raise gasoline prices in the United States, hiking prices at the pump 20 to 40 cents per gallon in the Midwest, with no long-term economic benefit to the U.S. economy, says a new report by Consumer Watchdog.

The report finds that:

•Drivers, especially in the Midwest, would pay 20 cents to 40 cents more at the pump if the disputed pipeline were built, as the current discount of up to $30 a barrel for Canadian oil disappears.
•The true goal of multinational oil companies and Canadian politicians backing the pipeline is to reach export outlets outside the U.S. for tar sands oil and refined fuels, which would drive up the oil’s price.
•With U.S. oil production rising fast, any “energy security” benefit for the U.S. would vanish as American oil output exceeds that of Saudi Arabia in about 2020, according to the International Energy Agency."

http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/newsrelease/consumer-watchdog-report-shows-keystone-xl-raises-american-gas-prices
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Consumer Watchdog: Keystone XL to raise Midwestern gasoline prices $.20-.40 at the pump (Original Post) wtmusic Jul 2013 OP
K&R. nt limpyhobbler Jul 2013 #1
bottlenecks do not result in cheaper prices ... quadrature Jul 2013 #2
CW disagrees with you NickB79 Jul 2013 #3
Bottlenecks do, if they have to sell and they are no buyers do to the bottleneck. happyslug Jul 2013 #4

NickB79

(19,276 posts)
3. CW disagrees with you
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 01:38 PM
Jul 2013
•Drivers, especially in the Midwest, would pay 20 cents to 40 cents more at the pump if the disputed pipeline were built, as the current discount of up to $30 a barrel for Canadian oil disappears.


Do you have any evidence to suggest their conclusions are wrong?
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
4. Bottlenecks do, if they have to sell and they are no buyers do to the bottleneck.
Fri Jul 19, 2013, 12:42 AM
Jul 2013

Right now, most of the oil from North Dakota and Canadian fields are bottle-necked in that HOW you can ship out the oil is limited. Thus they are limited to what one can ship, but not as to what one can produced. thus you have over production compared to users of the oil. i.e. Supply exceeds demand for oil in the area between Minnesota, Idaho and Colorado. That has kept prices DOWN in that area of the country compared to the rest of the US and the World.

The purpose of the Keystone pipeline is to open up a way to ship this oil to Texas, and thus the excess production would be used to satisfy world demand not just the upper Plains states.

Side Note: I hate the Term "Mid West" for it depends on who is talking to understand what that means. In this case it is the area between Minnesota, Idaho and Colorado. I have also seen it to mean the Area between Pittsburgh and Minnesota, centered around Chicago. I wish people would use terms more people understood AND I wish people would keep using a term as it has been used NOT as they would like it to mean. The term "Mid West" has became a term meaning NOT the east coast, but also not the West coast, but something in between.

Years ago, when the term was first invented usage of the term "Mid West" was restricted to the "Old Northwest" Territory that later became Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota. Pittsburgh was called a Mid Western City in an Eastern State for it is closer to Chicago then New York and large bulky cargo tend to come from New Orleans to Pittsburgh not over the Mountains from Philadelphia.

In recent decades I have read the term "Mid West" to mean Colorado to Minnesota to Idaho, i.e. the Northern Great Plains. The "West" had long ceased to include the West Coast, and is reserved for the Great Plains and the Western Mountains. Thus you have two different definitions of the same term, depending on who is using the term.

The only way out of this mess is to drop the term "Mid West" as becoming meaningless and use other terms. Thus I prefer to use the term the Great Plains for the area between the Rockies and the Mississippi River instead of the term "Mid West". The Northern Rockies for that area between the Great Plains and the Cascade Mountains. And the Term "Great Lakes Region" for that area between Pittsburgh, the Ohio River, the Great Lakes and the Mississippi River.

Just a comment on terms and that one should avoid using terms that may have different meanings to different people.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Consumer Watchdog: Keysto...