Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
Thu Jul 25, 2013, 11:36 AM Jul 2013

Nuclear: the worst source of energy, except for all the others.

[div style="float: left; padding-right: 12px;"]Opinion: Nuclear energy can be an ally in the fight against climate change

"There is good reason to give nuclear power a fresh look. It can replace fossil-fuel-burning power plants for generating electricity 24/7, avoiding air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions that could contribute to global warming.

According to climatologist James Hansen, longtime head of NASA’s Goddard Institute who first brought global warming to the attention of Congress in 1988, nuclear power globally has prevented 1.8 million air-pollution-related deaths and 64 gigatons of greenhouse gas emissions that would have resulted from burning fossil fuels. By mid-century, its use could prevent up to an additional 7 million deaths and 240 gigatons of greenhouse gas emissions, Hansen says.

There is a humanitarian imperative to using nuclear power. More than 2 billion people still lack access to electricity for basic needs such as clean water, cooking, sanitation and light. Nuclear power has the most potential to close the gap in energy availability between the world’s rich and its disadvantaged people."

http://www.nj.com/times-opinion/index.ssf/2013/07/opinion_nuclear_energy_can_be.html

Can Africa Go Nuclear? Energy Demands Battle With Safety Concerns Across The Continent

"Nuclear power generation is ramping up in South Africa, which recently signed a deal with the European Commission to cooperate on research, nuclear materials and equipment supplies. The deal will help bring power to South Africa's remote rural regions -- an initiative the rest of sub-Saharan Africa is eager to emulate.

South Africa is the only sub-Saharan African country with active nuclear power plants. But research-oriented nuclear reactors have been tested in a few other countries -- including Kenya, Ghana and the Democratic Republic of the Congo -- and it is clear that there is widespread interest in a nuclear-powered future all across the continent. Uganda, Nigeria, Senegal, Niger and others have expressed interest in building up nuclear expertise within their borders."

http://www.ibtimes.com/can-africa-go-nuclear-energy-demands-battle-safety-concerns-across-continent-1359279

Nuclear power 'would save about $150bn'

"THE inclusion of nuclear power in Australia's electricity generation mix could reduce power prices by 20 per cent and save about $150 billion from now until 2050 in greenhouse gas abatement costs and the health costs of burning fossil fuels, an analysis of future energy options has found.

The findings will be presented to an Australian Technology Sciences and Engineering conference in Sydney today. The two-day conference will include national and international experts, who will discuss the financial, social and economic issues surrounding nuclear energy. The report was based on analysis of two recent models of Australia's future electricity generation mix to 2050, the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism's energy white paper (2012), and the CSIRO's web-based modelling tool eFuture."

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/nuclear-power-would-save-about-150bn/story-e6frg8y6-1226684617877

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nuclear: the worst source of energy, except for all the others. (Original Post) wtmusic Jul 2013 OP
Nuclear waste WovenGems Jul 2013 #1
Does it really matter if a climate catastrophe is breathing down our necks wtmusic Jul 2013 #2
so you're proposing building lots of nuclear power plants in just a few years? CreekDog Jul 2013 #6
Perspective - nuclear waste will last for so very many years, and there is no djean111 Jul 2013 #3
Nuclear waste has been safely stored at 104 locations around the U.S. wtmusic Jul 2013 #5
The Austrailian = News Corp cprise Jul 2013 #4

WovenGems

(776 posts)
1. Nuclear waste
Thu Jul 25, 2013, 11:39 AM
Jul 2013

Nasty for eons. Safe and clean is what is needed. Maybe the British experiment with fission will work.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
2. Does it really matter if a climate catastrophe is breathing down our necks
Thu Jul 25, 2013, 11:41 AM
Jul 2013

within decades - or in as little as a few years?

Perspective.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. Perspective - nuclear waste will last for so very many years, and there is no
Thu Jul 25, 2013, 11:44 AM
Jul 2013

really safe place to put it.
Perspective - if time is that short, nuclear facilities seem to take many many many years to build - unless they are just thrown together.
Safety is being pitted against money here.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
5. Nuclear waste has been safely stored at 104 locations around the U.S.
Thu Jul 25, 2013, 12:04 PM
Jul 2013

for decades. Yucca would be a safer place to put it, but it was killed for political reasons, not safety.

A new, safe nuclear plant takes 5 years to build in France, but about twice as long to build in the U.S. because of regulatory hurdles and anti-nuclear activists who read magazine articles at hearings as a stalling tactic, driving up prices by $1 million/day.

Coal smoke kills 15,000 people in the U.S. every year. Radiation from a nuclear power plant has never killed a single person in the U.S. Coal plants are much cheaper to build and you are correct - safety is being pitted against money.

cprise

(8,445 posts)
4. The Austrailian = News Corp
Thu Jul 25, 2013, 11:56 AM
Jul 2013

They just led a successful putsch against Australia's PM Julia Gillard, unseating her. The main reasons for this were her positions on globalization and carbon taxes.

Its lovely they are so quick off the mark publicizing Australia's new policy intentions.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Nuclear: the worst source...