Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 12:40 PM Oct 2013

The U.S. And The World Are Actually Making Big Strides In Energy Efficiency

The U.S. And The World Are Actually Making Big Strides In Energy Efficiency
BY JEFF SPROSS ON OCTOBER 17, 2013 AT 5:03 PM

Between 2005 and 2010, advances in energy efficiency saved eleven advanced western nations — including the U.S. — from burning $420 billion worth of oil. And without those advances, the total energy consumption of those countries would have been 65 percent higher in 2010.

That’s the takeaway from new work by the International Energy Agency (IEA). It’s the first installment of what will be a regular report on energy efficiency by the group, and covers the U.S., the U.K., France, Germany, Australia, Japan, Italy, and several Nordic countries.

Between them all, those countries burned through just over 1,000 Mtoe (million tonnes oil-equivalent) energy; a little over 20 Mtoe of both electricity and natural gas, and around 5 Mtoe of both coal and other sources. On the flip side, they avoided a little over 1,500 Mtoe thanks to energy efficiency. And those gains have been steadily growing since 1974, while actual energy consumption grew only modestly.


Notes: TFC = total final consumption. The 11 countries are Australia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States.
CREDIT: INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY


Another recent energy efficiency report by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), focused on America specifically, found much the same story. Americans actually use less oil now than they did in 1973, our electricity use grew just six percent between 2000 and 2012, and we used less total energy in 2012 than in 1999 despite an economy that’s 25 percent bigger in real terms.

Economic growth actually decoupled from energy consumption back in the late 1970s. The former continued steadily upward...




http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/10/17/2801231/world-energy-efficiency/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The U.S. And The World Are Actually Making Big Strides In Energy Efficiency (Original Post) kristopher Oct 2013 OP
How much of that "decoupling" is offshoring of industry? caraher Oct 2013 #1
The energy efficiency movement started by OPEC's formation... kristopher Oct 2013 #2
Yeah, and they're making big strides in destroying the atmosphere as well. NNadir Oct 2013 #3
So what you're saying is NickB79 Oct 2013 #4
This is the mouthpiece of the DLC that was pscot Oct 2013 #5

caraher

(6,278 posts)
1. How much of that "decoupling" is offshoring of industry?
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 01:53 PM
Oct 2013

The global picture is what matters most. "the U.S., the U.K., France, Germany, Australia, Japan, Italy, and several Nordic countries" are not where manufacturing and other industrial activities are growing.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
2. The energy efficiency movement started by OPEC's formation...
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 03:44 PM
Oct 2013

...is seen as the prime driver of the decoupling. The countries where "manufacturing and industrial activities are growing" are also showing a widening gap between a) where they are re energy consumption and where they would be without energy efficiency measures (chart 1) and b) energy consumption and GDP growth (chart 2).



There are still tremendous amounts of energy efficiency gains available should be the takeaway from the article.

NNadir

(33,525 posts)
3. Yeah, and they're making big strides in destroying the atmosphere as well.
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 05:46 PM
Oct 2013

2013 will either be the worst year for year to year increases or the second worst.

In 1976 and 1980 the equally poorly educated fossil fuel funded ass told us that solar energy and efficiency would save us.

That worked out well, didn't it?

I would seem that in the scientifically illiterate sets they've never heard of Jevon's paradox.

We just passed the yearly minimum at the Mauna Loa CO2 observatory at 393 ppm, after going over 400 ppm earlier this year, but don't worry, be happy. Mark Z. Jacobsen is making the rounds on comedy shows on TV, so we're saved.

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/weekly.html

Congratulations on your continuing reference to "big" strides, "big" boy. Heckuva job. You must be very, very, very, very proud.

NickB79

(19,253 posts)
4. So what you're saying is
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 06:10 PM
Oct 2013

We've not only made big strides in decoupling our CO2 emissions from GDP, but we've also made big strides in decoupling our big strides from real-world impacts?

Winning!

pscot

(21,024 posts)
5. This is the mouthpiece of the DLC that was
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 10:25 PM
Oct 2013

Don't expect hard truths from the Clintons or their avatars.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The U.S. And The World Ar...