Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumOpinion: It’s time to get angry with so-called climate ‘sceptics’
by David Robert Grimes
The conclusions of the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) the worlds foremost authority on climate-change delivered late last month were seering and stark: Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, sea level has risen, and the concentrations of greenhouse gases have increased.
The findings are bleak, but not unexpected; climate change has been scientifically beyond doubt for a long time. Yet despite virtually all climatologists and researchers confirming this with vast swathes of supporting evidence, there are still loud voices doing their utmost to persuade us that the issue is still somehow open for debate.
In the US roughly half of media reports on climate change have doubted its existence. Publications like the Daily Mail, the Wall Street Journal and numerous Murdoch press give editorial support to these views.
Cynical and insulting
Such contrarian writers and broadcasters paint themselves as climate sceptics, but this is a calculated misnomer. Scepticism is an essential part of scientific endeavour. It demands all claims are treated as unproven until evidence and experience either confirm or falsify them. Denialism, by contrast, is the stubborn and persistent refusal to acknowledge what the evidence shows beyond all reasonable doubt.
more
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/climate-change-is-real-ignore-the-denialists-1.1570833#.Umixkcs08Fg.twitter
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)......involved." I'm not certain of the source; I'm tempted to attribute it to the English historian Lord Acton.
longship
(40,416 posts)Every one of them... sock puppets, I imagine.
mn9driver
(4,428 posts)It's the main reason Popular Science recently turned off comments permanently.
ffr
(22,671 posts)I either try to inform or I ignore deniers. And by ignore, that means all helpful information they could use, to better their lives, whatever. I cut them off and take a cynical approach towards them. After all, their support of climate denialism hurts me.
Either that or we need a whole new approach, where we jump on their band wagon to reap donations form the mega-donors, like a mole. Then use the funds to bear out the truth.
stuntcat
(12,022 posts)no mercy.
I thank them now for the complete FUCKLAND I'll be looking at in 2060.
pscot
(21,024 posts)Time to call out the people paying for the lies too. The Koch family shouldn't be allowed to appear in public without being challenged.