Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OnlinePoker

(5,725 posts)
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 03:12 PM Oct 2013

Real risk of a Maunder minimum 'Little Ice Age' says leading scientist

It’s known by climatologists as the ‘Little Ice Age’, a period in the 1600s when harsh winters across the UK and Europe were often severe.

The severe cold went hand in hand with an exceptionally inactive sun, and was called the Maunder solar minimum.

Now a leading scientist from Reading University has told me that the current rate of decline in solar activity is such that there’s a real risk of seeing a return of such conditions.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulhudson/posts/Real-risk-of-a-Maunder-minimum-Little-Ice-Age-says-leading-scientist

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Real risk of a Maunder minimum 'Little Ice Age' says leading scientist (Original Post) OnlinePoker Oct 2013 OP
So who's the guy n/t sharp_stick Oct 2013 #1
Already studied, and found to be no risk NickB79 Oct 2013 #2

NickB79

(19,257 posts)
2. Already studied, and found to be no risk
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 03:30 PM
Oct 2013
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2011/06/what-if-the-sun-went-into-a-new-grand-minimum/

since grand minima of solar activity did occur in the past, it is certainly interesting to explore what effects such a minimum might have on 21st century climate if it did occur. This is precisely the question Stefan Rahmstorf and I investigated in a study published last year (see also our press release. (Earlier estimates for the size of this effect can be found here and here.) In our study we find that a new Maunder Minimum would lead to a cooling of 0.3°C in the year 2100 at most – relative to an expected anthropogenic warming of around 4°C. (The amount of warming in the 21st century depends on assumptions about future emissions, of course).


So, by 2100 we would only be horribly fucked, as opposed to catastrophically fucked.

The real risk of a Maunder Minimum event would be that it would give ammo to the RW fucknuts who think AGW is a hoax, and slow the phase-out of fossil fuels.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Real risk of a Maunder mi...