Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum"The Future Is A Foreign Country, And People Do Things Differently There" - JM Greer
EDIT
That realization is the specter that haunts contemporary industrial society. For all our civilizations vaunted openness to change, the only changes most people nowadays are willing to contemplate are those that take us further in the direction were already going. Weve got fast transportation today, so there has to be something even faster tomorrowthats basically the justification Elon Musk gave for the Hyperloop, his own venture into antiquated futurism; weve got the internet today, so weve got to have some kind of uber-internet tomorrow. Its a peculiar sort of blindness, and one that civilizations of the past dont seem to have shared; as far as I know, for example, the designers of ancient Roman vomitoriums didnt insist that their technology was the wave of the future, and claim that future societies would inevitably build bigger and better places to throw up after banquets. (Those of my readers who find this comparison questionable might want to take a closer look at internet content.)
The future is a foreign country, and people do things differently there. Its hard to think of anything that flies so comprehensively in the face of todays conventional wisdom, or contradicts so many of the unquestioned assumptions of our time; thus its not surprising that Polycarpou, in suggesting it, seems to think that hes disagreeing with me. Quite the contrary; theres a reason why my most popular peak oil book is titled The Ecotechnic Future, rather than The Idyllic Peasant Future or some such twaddle. For that matter, Im not at all sure that he realizes I would agree with his characterization of the near- to mid-range future as a postmodern pastiche; Id suggest that the distributed communication will likely be much less high-tech than he thinks, and that hand tools and simple machinery will play a much larger role in the distributed manufacturing than 3D printers, but again, those are matters of detail.
Its in the longer run, I suspect, that our visions of the future diverge most sharply. Technological pastiche and bricolage, the piecing together of jerry-rigged systems out of scraps of surviving equipment and lore, are common features of ages of decline; its as the decline nears bottom that the first steps get taken toward a new synthesis, one that inevitably rejects many of the legacy technologies of the past and begins working on its own distinct projects. Vomitoriums werent the only familiar technology to land in historys compost heap in the post-Roman dark ages; chariots dropped out of use, too, along with a great many more elements of everyday Roman life. New values and new ideologies directed collective effort toward goals no Roman would have understood, and the harsh limits on resource availability in the radically relocalized post-Roman world also left their mark.
What often gets forgotten in reviewing the dark ages of the past is that they were not lapses into the past but gropings forward into an unknown future. There was a dark age before the Roman world and a dark age after it; the two had plenty of parallels, some of them remarkably exact, but the technologies were not the same, and Greek and Roman innovations in information processing and storageclassical logic and philosophy, widespread literacy, and the use of parchment as a readily available and reusable writing mediumwere preserved and transmitted in various forms, opening up possibilities in the post-Roman dark ages that were absent in the centuries that followed the fall of Mycenae.
EDIT
http://www.resilience.org/stories/2013-10-30/the-future-is-a-foreign-country
pscot
(21,024 posts)that "progress" is inevitable. A culture based on the proliferation of electronic media is the very definition of ephemeral.
hatrack
(59,592 posts)Just what we need - further encouragement of ever-shorter attention spans, and further stoking of the need for constant novelty, transience, and triviality.