Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 10:25 AM Nov 2013

Energy firm RWE npower axes £4bn UK windfarm amid political uncertainty

Energy firm RWE npower axes £4bn UK windfarm amid political uncertainty

Britain's green ambitions have been dealt a blow as a big six energy company has pulled the plug on one of the world's largest offshore windfarms, with the political storm enveloping the industry threatening the multibillion-pound investments needed to meet emissions targets and head off a looming capacity crunch.

Weeks after warning that the government was treating environmental subsidies as a "political football", the German-owned RWE npower is pulling out of the £4bn Atlantic Array project in the Bristol Channel because the economics do not stack up.

The move comes as figures show that energy firms reaped a 77% increase in profits per customer last year, due to bill increases that the big six say are partly due to government green levies.

The shelving of the Atlantic Array is a setback for the government, which is banking on bigger windfarms in deeper waters to help provide low-carbon power. The RWE cancellation is the first axing of a Round 3 windfarm – schemes such as those in Dogger Bank, Hornsea and East Anglia, which are supposed to help the government meet a target of generating 15% of energy from renewable sources by 2020. It will also raise further concerns about investors being frightened away by political rows and policy uncertainty.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Energy firm RWE npower axes £4bn UK windfarm amid political uncertainty (Original Post) GliderGuider Nov 2013 OP
Article doesn't mention dipsydoodle Nov 2013 #1
I guess that comes under the heading of "political rows". GliderGuider Nov 2013 #2
The strike price just wasn't high enough. FBaggins Nov 2013 #3

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
1. Article doesn't mention
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 10:32 AM
Nov 2013

there was a lot of resisrance from both the "not in my back yard brigade" despite the fact is was 11 miles offshore and also from environmetalists concerned about birds on Lundy.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
2. I guess that comes under the heading of "political rows".
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 10:40 AM
Nov 2013

The world would run so much more smoothly if it wasn't for peoples' feeling,.

FBaggins

(26,748 posts)
3. The strike price just wasn't high enough.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 10:44 AM
Nov 2013

And it declines for new projects in following years too rapidly.

Government expects (correctly) offshore prices to fall rapidly. But they built a faster-than-reasonable decline into the system they created - which will reduce investment and thus further slow down the rate of price declines. It's a vicious cycle that could submarine the industry.Predictions for UK offshore capacity by 2020 have fallen by about 75% in just the last few years.

Government has to figure out a way to get these projects built.

Interestingly, it could be the long build time of nuclear plants (and the delay in setting the strike price) that saves some of them. If the first electricity from the new plants isn't expected until 2023, then they can shuffle some additional support to offshore wind without busting their budget plan. Flatten the curve a bit and some of the initial capital outlays for these earlier projects will look better.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Energy firm RWE npower ax...