Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:08 PM Nov 2013

World Bank says no to nuclear as it lays out universal energy plan

http://grist.org/news/world-bank-says-no-to-nuclear-as-it-lays-out-universal-energy-plan/

?w=470&h=265&crop=1

***SNIP

Agence France-Presse reports on the no-nukes angle:

“The World Bank Group does not engage in providing support for nuclear power. We think that this is an extremely difficult conversation that every country is continuing to have[," Kim said.]

“And because we are really not in that business our focus is on finding ways of working in hydro electric power, in geo-thermal, in solar, in wind,” he said.

“We are really focusing on increasing investment in those modalities and we don’t do nuclear energy.”
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
World Bank says no to nuclear as it lays out universal energy plan (Original Post) xchrom Nov 2013 OP
That seems like wonderful news. djean111 Nov 2013 #1
Nuclear energy is the Pandora's box that should never have been opened. madokie Nov 2013 #2
That makes perfect sense kristopher Nov 2013 #3
At least in the good ol' USA, Obama has pledged loans for the nuke truedelphi Nov 2013 #4
+1 kristopher Nov 2013 #5
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. That seems like wonderful news.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 02:19 PM
Nov 2013

Even from a purely soulless monetary viewpoint, disposal of nuclear waste and the costs of a catastrophe like Fukushima should make even the most greedy investor steer clear of nuclear power.
Charging customers upfront for paying for this stuff has started, I believe, to really empty the piggy bank that nuclear investors see customers as.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
2. Nuclear energy is the Pandora's box that should never have been opened.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 02:29 PM
Nov 2013

on paper it seems to be the only way to go and if things are going good its not quiet so bad but once accidents happen its all hell breaks loose. The nuclear power industry claims that its not killed but a few in all these years but every indication is it has been killing people since day one.
I don't trust them as far as I could throw a nuclear power plant. We had a run in with them here locally 30 - 40 years ago and the lies they told us then made believers our of us around here that they are not to be trusted. We stopped PSO from building a nuclear power plant near here. The only plant that was canceled after they'd already site preparations.

When things go wrong they have the potential to go wrong in a big way. I doubt anyone alive today will see the day that it will be perfectly safe at the Fukushima site.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
3. That makes perfect sense
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 05:27 PM
Nov 2013

It is especially good for the people being served by these World Bank projects.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
4. At least in the good ol' USA, Obama has pledged loans for the nuke
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 06:08 AM
Nov 2013

Industry. I mean, for Pete's sake, nuclear energy doesn't emit harmful VOC's!

And in just a few hundred thousand years, the nasty half life isotopes will be fairly harmless.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»World Bank says no to nuc...