Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumWhy it’s a big deal that half of the Great Lakes are still covered in ice
http://grist.org/climate-energy/why-its-a-big-deal-that-half-of-the-great-lakes-are-still-covered-in-ice-2/?w=470&h=265&crop=1
***SNIP
Like the shipping troubles, some of the more unexpected things the lakes and their ecosystems could face in the next few months are the direct result of the lingering ice and cold:
Throughout the winter, huge numbers of ducks that feed by diving below the water for fish ended up starving to death. Connie Adams, a biologist in New Yorks Department of Environmental Conservation, told the AP that the die-off was unprecedented.
Next in line for concern are a huge number of the Lakes fish species. Warming water temperature often biologically triggers migration to traditional spawning grounds, and experts expect that northern pike, lake sturgeon, steelhead, and rainbow trout could make moves far later this year. As Shedd Aquarium research scientist Solomon David told Michigan Radio, later egg laying could mean younger and far weaker fish come next winter, leading to an even longer impact.
Other changes will come about long after the ice melts, as water levels are predicted to rebound to levels not seen in the last few years. Seasonal shifts in water levels, with winter lows and summer highs, are normal. If things stayed in sort of a balance, we would see all the Lakes water levels going up and then going down. Every year: up, down; up, down, says Drew Gronewold, a scientist with NOAAs Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory. But, when water levels change a lot over time, something is happening in one of those two parts of the season.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Thanks for posting!
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)that photo. It is out of date.
Lake Erie is mostly ice free now.
Not xchrom's fault, but that is lazy
journalism.
NOAA is your friend.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)hue
(4,949 posts)dotymed
(5,610 posts)IMO, it is way more than interesting. It is very critical.
If "our" administration had "actionable intelligence" about highly increasing "terrorist" activity, they would move heaven and earth to
prevent it from occurring (so they say).
Too bad there is no profit in this chilling and actionable (at least in the long run) intel.
It seems that the real threat goes unchallenged once again. Not sexy or profitable enough (in the short run).
Scruffy Rumbler
(961 posts)but didn't I learn in elementary school that the Great Lakes froze over every year? What is unusual now is that they hadn't for awhile!
riqster
(13,986 posts)Scruffy Rumbler
(961 posts)I grew up in Northern New York. I have an older buddy that grew up in Boston. We were talking about the snow storms in May we used to get.
Aldo Leopold
(685 posts)will be good for the dwindling population of wolves on the island. Either by allowing them to escape, or by luring mainland female wolves to the island. I could be wrong, but I believe there is only one female wolf left on Isle Royale.
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)Or has the ice not stretched that far? I'm sure the National Park Service is on top of the situation though either way.
postulater
(5,075 posts)They do no management as they consider this a natural phenomenon and are using the cycles as a study in population control.
Isle Royale is an amazing place.