Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 01:26 PM Jun 2014

Climate action could spur $2 trillion in economic growth in 2030 alone

http://grist.org/news/climate-action-could-spur-2-trillion-in-economic-growth-in-2030-alone/

?w=470&h=264
Unclogging streets in India could encourage economic growth and help save the climate at the same time.

Republicans in Congress, dim-witted politicians abroad, and fossil-fuel companies would all like you to believe that taking action on climate change is too expensive. Better to blow all our cash and credit on unsustainable oil and coal today and live large and dirty for as long as possible, they argue.

Cue World Bank study.

The international lender, which has been belatedly waking up to the dangers of climate change in recent years, modeled the potential costs and benefits of using taxes, incentives, and regulations to clean up key sectors of some of the world’s biggest economies. It analyzed reforms that could spur cleaner transportation, more efficient industrial use of energy, and less energy-hungry buildings and appliances. It concluded that such reforms would create GDP growth of $1.8 trillion to $2.6 trillion per year by 2030.

Oh, and it would prevent 94,000 premature deaths annually.


In many cases, the analysts looked at local case studies, such as the benefits of providing rural Chinese with cleaner cookstoves and improving public transportation in an Indian city, then considered what the impacts would be if those initiatives were scaled up to national or regional levels. They concluded that the public-health, economic-development, food-supply, and energy-supply benefits of reforms in those key sectors far outweighed the costs of the reforms.


?w=470&h=353
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Climate action could spur $2 trillion in economic growth in 2030 alone (Original Post) xchrom Jun 2014 OP
Ironically, the best outcome (in an admittedly cold & objective manner) would be ... Nihil Jun 2014 #1
 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
1. Ironically, the best outcome (in an admittedly cold & objective manner) would be ...
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:41 AM
Jun 2014

... from reducing the emissions, saving the energy but not saving the lives.

The chances of it happening that way round though are far worse than the
chances of it not happening at all.


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Climate action could spur...