Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,593 posts)
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 10:16 AM Jul 2014

Lake Mead At Lowest Level Since 1937, When Biggest US Reservoir Was First Being Filled

Lake Mead—America’s largest reservoir, Las Vegas’ main water source and an important indicator for water supplies in the Southwest—will fall this week to its lowest level since 1937 when the manmade lake was first being filled, according to forecasts from the federal Bureau of Reclamation.



The record-setting low water mark—a surface elevation of 1,081.8 feet above sea level—will not trigger any restrictions for the seven states in the Colorado River Basin. Restrictions will most likely come in 2016 when the lake is projected to drop below 1,075 feet, a threshold that forces cuts in water deliveries to Arizona and Nevada, states at the head of the line for rationing. But the steadily draining lake does signal an era of new risks and urgency for an iconic and ebbing watershed that provides up to 40 million people in the U.S. and Mexico with a portion of their drinking water. The rules governing the river are complex, but the risk equation is straightforward: less supply due to a changing climate, plus increasing demands from new development, leads to greater odds of shortages.

No area is more vulnerable than Las Vegas, which draws 90 percent of its water from Lake Mead. Today, in the midst of the basin’s driest 14-year period in the historical record, the gambler’s paradise is completing an expensive triage. The regional water authority is spending at least $US 829 million of ratepayer money to dig two tunnels—one at the lake bottom that will be completed next spring and the other an emergency connection between existing intakes—to ensure that the 2 million residents of southern Nevada can still drink from Mead as more of the big lake reverts to desert.

EDIT

While the lower basin keeps an eye on Lake Mead, the upper basin is more concerned about water levels in Lake Powell, the second largest reservoir on the Colorado, 180 miles upstream (290 kilometers) from Mead. The upper basin put forward a plan this spring to keep more water in Powell. The states would do this by paying farmers not to farm and by changing how smaller mountain reservoirs are managed. Three urban water utilities in the lower basin, along with Denver and the federal government, put up $US 11 million to develop a similar basin-wide program.

EDIT

http://ecowatch.com/2014/07/07/lake-mead-reservoir-record-low-drought/1/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

drm604

(16,230 posts)
2. I wonder how far it can drop before Hoover Dam hydropower is affected.
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 10:51 AM
Jul 2014

How big an area is dependent on Hoover Dam for electricity?

FBaggins

(26,775 posts)
3. That has already occured
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 11:54 AM
Jul 2014

Capacity is down by about 25%

If water levels continue to fall at the same rate, it will be at about half of original capacity in the next 2-3 years - and even that lower level is only possible because of newer turbines that make generation possible with almost 100 fewer feet of head room.

hatrack

(59,593 posts)
4. I know that generation is affected well before the water drops to the level of the intakes
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 11:55 AM
Jul 2014

At Glen Canyon Dam, for example, the intakes to the power station are located at 3470' (above sea level) but that generation would have to shut down at lake elevation of around 3520'. If you don't have a certain depth of water above the intakes, you run the risk of introducing air into the penstocks and turbines, and that's a big problem.

Hoover's a slightly different structure, with the water entering through intake towers that sit back from the upstream face of the dam, and I don't know the height of the intakes there, but would imagine it's subject to similar constraints once the water falls so far.

mountain grammy

(26,658 posts)
5. Our mountain reservoirs are full, They are the first on the Colorado River
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 11:57 AM
Jul 2014

We live at the headwaters. Our snowpack this year was 170% of normal after starting the winter with high reservoir levels due to last fall's record rains. We just took a road trip to the Grand Canyon and Moab, following the Colorado River and it is running at record flows. Lakes Powell and Mead should benefit, but we must remember where we live and quit wasting precious water on things like fracking.

hatrack

(59,593 posts)
6. It's been wet out there - not quite the big La Nina of 2013, but still impressive
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 12:03 PM
Jul 2014

I envy you your trip - I vividly remember my very first time driving into Moab on Highway 128.

It was right at sunset and all of a sudden, boom, there it was - that dazzling river, that amazing canyon. Absolutely jaw-dropping!

OnlinePoker

(5,727 posts)
8. Lake Powell is at the top of its refill for the year
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 02:09 PM
Jul 2014

And it is only at 52.21% of capacity. Still, it's better than this time last year where it was 1.1 million acre feet lower. But they are also only at 67.3% of the mandated releases despite the water year being 78% complete. They are required to release another 2.7 million acre feet by the end of September.
http://lakepowell.water-data.com/

hunter

(38,337 posts)
9. Here's a photo of the back side of the dam...
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 11:22 PM
Jul 2014


22 May 1935 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoover_Dam

That will give anyone looking at it now a good idea of how low it can go.



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Lake Mead At Lowest Level...