Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumCO Democrats Cave to Industry on Fracking
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/08/05/outrage-colorado-over-fracking-betrayal-top-democrats
Outrage in Colorado over Fracking Betrayal of Top Democrats
Politicians announce drilling regulatory panel will welcome input by industry and business groups, headed by XTO Energy president
byLauren McCauley, staff writer
In what is being slammed as a hijacking of the democratic processand a cave to pressure by the oil and gas industrytop Colorado Democrats have pulled two anti-fracking initiatives from the state's November ballot despite huge grassroots support behind the proposals.
On the day Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) was expected to hand in nearly 300,000 signatures in favor of ballot initiatives 88 and 89, which sought to provide greater local control over fracking operations, he announced that he had dropped support for the measures in favor of a deal brokered by Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper. Instead of allowing citizens to vote on shale oil and gas drilling in their communities, the politicians announced during a joint press conference that they are establishing a task forceled by XTO Energy President Randy Cleveland and taking input from business groups along with the oil and gas industrythat will craft drilling regulations.
Polis' about-face met with immediate condemnation from residents who supported the measures.
We are outraged to see politicians once again prioritizing political expediency over the health and well being of Coloradans. The proposed compromise represents a failure on the part of both Polis and Hickenlooper to protect Coloradans from the dangers of fracking, said Russell Mendell of Frack Free Colorado.
We are outraged to see politicians once again prioritizing political expediency over the health and well being of Coloradans.
Russell Mendell, Frack Free Colorado
Local environmentalists responded with an open letter to Polis, charging, "Your actions prove that we not only have an environmental crisis, but also a democracy crisis."
The letter continues:
[W]e made it clear that we expect our right to clean air, pure water and natural and scenic values to be represented in the Colorado Constitution. And we expect that our local governments are there to protect us. By withdrawing these initiatives, you also withdrew the voice of Coloradans.
You have said, in essence, that 'we the people' should not have the right to protect our communities from fracking. You, left us naked and unarmed to protect ourselves from what, by default, are non-sensible regulations which violate rights to safety. In Colorado we have 52,000 active oil and gas wells, 74,000 abandoned wells, 13 inspectors, 500 spills a year. Thats two a day now, Jared.
Demanding the right to bring the anti-fracking initiatives to a vote, the letter concludes, "The democratic process is not yours to steal. It, like Colorados environment, is the common property of all Coloradans."
The proposed legislation would have forbade any fracking operations from within 2000 feet of schools, hospitals and other community facilities, and established an environmental bill of rights allowing local governments precedence when laws conflict with the state.
After Polis announced he had dropped his support of the measureswhich he paid millions of his personal money to fundthe signatures were in fact submitted to the secretary of state's office by the group responsible for the signature gathering, Coloradans for Safe and Clean Energy. However, after news that two industry-backed measures were pulled, the group announced they too would support the compromise and withdraw the initiatives, The Hill reports.
The industry-supported initiatives, 121 and 137, would have restricted towns that banned fracking for natural gas from receiving tax revenues from oil and gas development.
Local reporting indicated that "Democratic insiders" were concerned that the strong industry opposition to the anti-fracking initiatives would "effectively pump another $10 million into the GOP field operation this fall, likely imperiling [U.S. Senator Mark] Udall and [Democratic congressional candidate Andrew] Romanoffs chances of victory."
After Monday's press conference, Sen. Udall issued a statement saying he "applauded" the compromise, adding that it is "welcome news and underscores how all of Colorado benefits when we find common ground."
However, the outrage over the "eleventh-hour deal" came swiftly as grassroots groups and regional anti-fracking activists vowed to keep up the fight regardless of the political flip-flop of top Democrats.
Sam Schabacker, regional director for Food & Water Watch said that the "hollow" compromise "will not protect Colorado communities, does not promote real local control, and will not make fracking any less of a hazard for our water, our air and our health."
"Its a sad day when politicians subvert the will of the people, added Karen Wagner of Citizens for a Healthy Fort Collins. We will continue to fight the toxic industry that puts our families and communities at risk."
This is further evidence that real progress cannot come from the top down, and true change will continue to come from citizen, grassroots organizing," said Mendell of Frack Free Colorado. Mendell added that the deal "only strengthens our resolve to work in our communities for real citizen initiatives that will ensure a safe and healthy future for all Coloradans."
Adding his voice to the chorus, 350.org founder Bill McKibben tweeted: "When 300,000 people stand up, politicians should listen."
Mods, note that the article is under Creative Commons, and can be (and has been) reproduced here in full (except a photo that is also at the link).
I can certainly understand not wanting Mark Udall's reelection to be jeopardized by a massive infusion of oil ca$h against him, but couldn't the CO Democrats have leveraged the power of those 300,000 citizen petition signers in some better way than ignoring and denying them?
-app
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 640 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CO Democrats Cave to Industry on Fracking (Original Post)
appal_jack
Aug 2014
OP
newfie11
(8,159 posts)1. I guess it doesn't make a difference which way you vote in Colorado
They are all bought and paid!
I'm hoping this isn't going nationwide.
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)2. Worse yet, the Repubs might actually stand for something.
When Michael Bloomburp and his various astroturf gun-grabber organizations said that they were going to dump cash into CO (and other states) for gun control measures, did the Repubs quiver in their boots and fold? No, they struck back and successfully recalled two of the worst gun-grabbing politicians (both Democrats, alas) in CO.
Protecting the environment is one of the reasons I remain an active Democrat. But with the CO Democratic Party willing to trade this issue away, will CO environmentalists be motivated to go to the polls in 2014? "But the Repubs are worse," is hardly an inspirational rallying cry.
-app
Nihil
(13,508 posts)3. And people still apparently wonder why Nader won any votes? (n/t)