Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumScientists, speak up on climate change
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/11/09/scientists-speak-climate-change/Ht0r44A5PWPmr4uJL8167N/story.html[font face=Serif][font size=5]Scientists, speak up on climate change[/font]
By James Carroll | Globe Staff November 09, 2014
[font size=3] Science has spoken, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said the other day, presenting the latest dire warning on climate change. There is no ambiguity in their message. Leaders must act. Time is not on our side.
One could almost feel the breeze stirred by the broad populations collective shrug at this news coming from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change meeting in Copenhagen. Almost as astonishing as the looming threat that carbon poisons pose for the planet is theindifference that average Americans seem to feel about it. Such climate denial, now decades old, translates into a lack of political pressure on Washington, which in turn results in the failure of both presidential administrations and Congress to rise vigorously in defense of the environment. Meanwhile the clock is ticking. Continued emission of greenhouse gases, the UN panel declared, will cause further warming and long-lasting changes in all components of the climate system, increasing the likelihood of severe, pervasive, and irreversible impacts for people and ecosystems.
Science has spoken, Ban said. But have scientists? It seems so: 97 percent of climate scientists say climate change is real, caused by humans, and threatening global catastrophe. Hundreds of scientific societies, academies, agencies, and NGOs have weighed in without ambiguity. Yet reliable polls show that fewer than half of Americans know of this overwhelming scientific consensus. The fossil fuel industry, and the politicians who do its bidding, have waged a remarkably successful disinformation campaign, making it seem that scientists are divided on the question, when they are anything but.
What would it take for the public to get clear both on the unanimity of climate scientists, and on the urgency of what they see coming? An answer from the recent past suggests itself: scientists, instead of merely providing activists and journalists with irrefutable climate data, must leave their cloistered laboratories to become activists themselves. Scientists must take to the streets and lead, even if that means taking hits in the contentious public square.
[/font][/font]
By James Carroll | Globe Staff November 09, 2014
[font size=3] Science has spoken, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said the other day, presenting the latest dire warning on climate change. There is no ambiguity in their message. Leaders must act. Time is not on our side.
One could almost feel the breeze stirred by the broad populations collective shrug at this news coming from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change meeting in Copenhagen. Almost as astonishing as the looming threat that carbon poisons pose for the planet is theindifference that average Americans seem to feel about it. Such climate denial, now decades old, translates into a lack of political pressure on Washington, which in turn results in the failure of both presidential administrations and Congress to rise vigorously in defense of the environment. Meanwhile the clock is ticking. Continued emission of greenhouse gases, the UN panel declared, will cause further warming and long-lasting changes in all components of the climate system, increasing the likelihood of severe, pervasive, and irreversible impacts for people and ecosystems.
Science has spoken, Ban said. But have scientists? It seems so: 97 percent of climate scientists say climate change is real, caused by humans, and threatening global catastrophe. Hundreds of scientific societies, academies, agencies, and NGOs have weighed in without ambiguity. Yet reliable polls show that fewer than half of Americans know of this overwhelming scientific consensus. The fossil fuel industry, and the politicians who do its bidding, have waged a remarkably successful disinformation campaign, making it seem that scientists are divided on the question, when they are anything but.
What would it take for the public to get clear both on the unanimity of climate scientists, and on the urgency of what they see coming? An answer from the recent past suggests itself: scientists, instead of merely providing activists and journalists with irrefutable climate data, must leave their cloistered laboratories to become activists themselves. Scientists must take to the streets and lead, even if that means taking hits in the contentious public square.
[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 936 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scientists, speak up on climate change (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Nov 2014
OP
chervilant
(8,267 posts)1. Some folks, including
my nephew and a few right-leaning acquaintances, are convinced that our government has been operating a 'chemtrails' project for decades now--to 'control the weather.' Some argue that this 'chemtrail' protocol has effed up our ecosystem.
Our species is like a ginormous floating turd, swirling around in the cosmic toilet we've created on this amazing planet. Something tells me the ecosystem will hit the flusher soon.
OKIsItJustMe
(19,938 posts)2. I know some lefties who believe in “chemtrails.”
chervilant
(8,267 posts)3. Are they third-wayers? n/t
cprise
(8,445 posts)4. Dupes of third-wayers, no doubt. n/t
chervilant
(8,267 posts)5. If you followed the link
in that DUer's post, you might (like me) wonder why a discussion of contrails is offered as "proof" that "some lefties" believe in "chemtrails."