Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 01:35 PM Dec 2014

An unintended consequence of the drive to energy independence

It is ironic that recent American success at moving towards energy independence in fossil fuels may have unintentionally damaged the global economy.

American success at increasing domestic oil production, in concert with declining domestic oil demand since the recession in 2008, took much of its previous demand for imports off the world oil market. According to the EIA, in the 8 years from 2006 to 2014 the world's international oil market lost 8.6 million barrels per day (mbpd) of US demand. That 8.6 mbpd represents a decline of 65% in US imports, which manifests as the disappearance of an astonishing 20 to 25% of the international market for oil - and the decline is continuing.

Even in a managed and manipulated market such a drop can't help but depress world oil prices, much to the economic discomfort of such exporters as Russia, Iran, Nigeria and Venezuela.

While the decline in American oil imports isn't the sole cause of the world's economic woes, it's definitely a contributing factor. Unanticipated consequences are common in complex systems like a globalized economy - this appears to be one of them.

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MTTNTUS2&f=M

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An unintended consequence of the drive to energy independence (Original Post) GliderGuider Dec 2014 OP
Eventually that would happen anyhow as the world turns to alternatives. The world needs to start jwirr Dec 2014 #1
Rebuilding a high-energy economy takes a lot of money. GliderGuider Dec 2014 #2
Exactly. jwirr Dec 2014 #3
that is why DonCoquixote Dec 2014 #5
Canada is not the whole world. quadrature Dec 2014 #6
that's total nonsense! Demeter Dec 2014 #4
I don't think it has damaged the world economy. Yo_Mama Dec 2014 #7
It's hurting the income of nations, not just the elites. GliderGuider Dec 2014 #8
But what hurts the income of nations in one way helps the income of nations in another. Yo_Mama Dec 2014 #9
Not always. GliderGuider Dec 2014 #10
Large boost? FogerRox Dec 2014 #13
Demand destruction 4dsc Dec 2014 #11
Unintended? FogerRox Dec 2014 #12

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
1. Eventually that would happen anyhow as the world turns to alternatives. The world needs to start
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 01:51 PM
Dec 2014

rebuilding local economies around making things that can be consumed by the people in their own nations. That kind of economy can withstand change.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
2. Rebuilding a high-energy economy takes a lot of money.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 02:04 PM
Dec 2014

If the world economy ends up in tatters first, where does that money come from?

What could end up happening is the rebuilding of local economies at far lower levels of energy dissipation, economic activity - and lower population levels in consequence. That's perhaps a good long-term outcome for the biosphere, but maybe not so much for people...

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
5. that is why
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 04:31 PM
Dec 2014

as we switch to hybirds and other sources, we make sure we grow the ecomnomy by build thesed sources up. Europe is ahead of us on this, but the fact that even GM and Ford are selling low mpg cars and hybrids shows there is a demand.

 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
6. Canada is not the whole world.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 01:36 AM
Dec 2014

Most of the world would benefit
by tossing the middle east in the shit can.
Most, however, is not everybody.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
4. that's total nonsense!
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 02:22 PM
Dec 2014

The oil glut is due to the global economy collapsing around our ears due to the austerity policies that the IMF, BIS, ECB, and all the rest of that alphabet soup, coupled with the quest for profits uber alles, which means starving everything else. Lack of Demand.

If no effort goes into public education, public health (ebola, anyone?), regulating the fraud perpetrated by banksters, product development, or career ladders, then the whole machine binds up and self-destructs, and there are no profits to rake off.

Greed and bankster speculation pushed oil up to unsustainable prices; anyone with a brain and a little capital went renewable, which is what will keep the lights on in the rapidly approaching Dark Ages, Part 2.

Going renewable cuts out the middleman, forcing the profiteering pirates to find more productive employment. Going renewable increases productivity. That's never damaging to an economy.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
7. I don't think it has damaged the world economy.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 07:23 AM
Dec 2014

I think what you will see is more of shift in consumption from some areas to another.

Further, the drop in oil prices may hurt the elite incomes of a relatively few, but that drop in income is essentially transferred into the pockets of those who need the money far more. They will spend that, because they need stuff. They won't spend it on luxury yachts or golden bathroom fixtures - they'll spend it on education, food, medicine, shoes and clothing.

The US was headed toward recession before oil dropped. Now it won't roll over, because the effective incomes of the many cash-strapped households just gained.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
8. It's hurting the income of nations, not just the elites.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 10:04 AM
Dec 2014

Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Nigeria are already hurting, with more to follow. Any nation that depends to a large degree on oil income for its revenue is at rusk - much as Mexico was. A long-term depression in the price of oil could trigger the spread of failed states among oil exporters. In the long run it will balance out, but the potential for global social disruption is increased by low oil prices. Plus the pension funds that so many middle-class people are counting on for retirement may see significant losses due to their investment in energy stocks.

This isn't just a problem for the 1% and the Kochsuckers. We may save at the pumps, but what good is that if wee lose our jobs or our retirements?

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
9. But what hurts the income of nations in one way helps the income of nations in another.
Fri Dec 19, 2014, 07:49 AM
Dec 2014

Just look at the US. We are a large petroleum producer, and we may lose 50-75K jobs over this, plus profits will be lower. But in the overall economy, it's clearly a stimulant. Because incomes have been stagnant to declining for most, every dollar not spent at the pump or for heating oil goes back into the economy in another venue, thus supporting growth and profits and jobs in those other venues. We will probably gain over 500K jobs over the next year due to this pricing.

This is a big plus for Japan, for India, and on net, for the US. It's a very significant aid for parts of Europe. It helps China.

On net, structurally lower oil prices will be a large boost for the world economy.

And these are structurally lower prices, because the fracking tech has improved a lot, current wells are producing profitably at no more than $30 a barrel, and often significantly less, and even if new fracking projects slow, which I expect they will, there are new Canadian projects due to come on line next year.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
10. Not always.
Fri Dec 19, 2014, 11:35 AM
Dec 2014

If it hurts a keystone nation, the result could easily be a global recession, and that would hurt everyone. Complex systems are notorious for having unforeseen tipping points.

FogerRox

(13,211 posts)
13. Large boost?
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 01:59 PM
Dec 2014

At the end of the day, the same amount of money is circulating thru the economy, so the multiplier of this stimulus is not very good.

 

4dsc

(5,787 posts)
11. Demand destruction
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 12:59 PM
Dec 2014

has to fruition as predicted by many in the peak oil arena. Oil isn't the only so called equities that is falling. From gold to copper the fall is being noted.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»An unintended consequence...