Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 01:45 PM Jan 2015

The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C

The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C

Policy makers have generally agreed that the average global temperature rise caused by greenhouse gas emissions should not exceed 2 °C above the average global temperature of pre-industrial times. It has been estimated that to have at least a 50 per cent chance of keeping warming below 2 °C throughout the twenty-first century, the cumulative carbon emissions between 2011 and 2050 need to be limited to around 1,100 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (Gt CO2). However, the greenhouse gas emissions contained in present estimates of global fossil fuel reserves are around three times higher than this, and so the unabated use of all current fossil fuel reserves is incompatible with a warming limit of 2 °C.

Here we use a single integrated assessment model that contains estimates of the quantities, locations and nature of the world’s oil, gas and coal reserves and resources, and which is shown to be consistent with a wide variety of modelling approaches with different assumptions, to explore the implications of this emissions limit for fossil fuel production in different regions. Our results suggest that, globally, a third of oil reserves, half of gas reserves and over 80 per cent of current coal reserves should remain unused from 2010 to 2050 in order to meet the target of 2 °C.

We show that development of resources in the Arctic and any increase in unconventional oil production are incommensurate with efforts to limit average global warming to 2 °C. Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territorial fossil fuels are, in aggregate, inconsistent with their commitments to this temperature limit. Implementation of this policy commitment would also render unnecessary continued substantial expenditure on fossil fuel exploration, because any new discoveries could not lead to increased aggregate production.

So the world has to leave 2/3 of our FF reserves in the ground. Anybody want to make a friendly wager on whether we'll actually do that?
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C (Original Post) GliderGuider Jan 2015 OP
If some global epidemic that wipes out 90% of the species comes along any time soon... NYC_SKP Jan 2015 #1
That's what it would take IMO. GliderGuider Jan 2015 #2
^^THIS^^ 2naSalit Jan 2015 #3
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. If some global epidemic that wipes out 90% of the species comes along any time soon...
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 01:49 PM
Jan 2015

...then there's a chance.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The geographical distribu...