Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 04:26 PM Feb 2012

Why the Environmental Movement Is Not Winning

A new report places the blame on misguided strategies of environmental funders.

A searing new report says the environmental movement is not winning and lays the blame squarely on the failed policies of environmental funders. The movement hasn't won any "significant policy changes at the federal level in the United States since the 1980s" because funders have favored top-down elite strategies and have neglected to support a robust grassroots infrastructure. Environmental funders spent a whopping $10 billion between 2000 and 2009 but achieved relatively little because they failed to underwrite grassroots groups that are essential for any large-scale change, the report says. Released in late February by the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy, Cultivating the Grassroots was written by Sarah Hansen, who served as executive director of the Environmental Grantmakers Association from 1998 to 2005.

Environmental funders mainly support large, professionalized environmental organizations instead of the scrappy community-based groups that are most heavily impacted by environmental harms. Organizations with annual budgets greater than $5 million make up only 2 percent of all environmental groups, yet receive more than half of all environmental grants and donations.

The report makes the simple but profound argument that the current environmental funding strategy is not working and that, without targeting philanthropy at communities most impacted by environmental harms, the movement will continue to fail. "Our funding strategy is misaligned with the great perils our planet and environment face," Hansen writes.

"Environmental activists and funders all share a gnawing sense that something has to change. No sensible environmental activist would argue that we, as a field, have done what is needed to respond to environmental degradation," Hansen said in an interview.

http://www.alternet.org/environment/154290/why_the_environmental_movement_is_not_winning?page=entire

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why the Environmental Movement Is Not Winning (Original Post) XemaSab Feb 2012 OP
excellent! xchrom Feb 2012 #1
What could they have accomplished with 10 billion dollars... Indydem Feb 2012 #2
the environmental movement will never "succeed" because Garrett Hardin was right.... mike_c Feb 2012 #3
The ironic thing is that what the article says ISN'T happening, in fact IS happening. GliderGuider Feb 2012 #4

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
1. excellent!
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 04:31 PM
Feb 2012
and they should be called out -- i feel a lot of progressive movements -- not just the environmental movement have been caught in the exact same trap.
 

Indydem

(2,642 posts)
2. What could they have accomplished with 10 billion dollars...
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 04:36 PM
Feb 2012

If they had spent it on innovation rather than lobbying and supporting ineffectual fat cats??

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
3. the environmental movement will never "succeed" because Garrett Hardin was right....
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 04:37 PM
Feb 2012

Someone will always cheat for personal advantage. If we could somehow induce 99 percent of humanity to act responsibly and sustainably, the remaining one percent would still screw up the planet for profit. I mean, we KNOW the impact burning fossil fuels has, we KNOW we're inducing climate change at the planetary level, and we KNOW we're polluting our environment at an unprecedented rate, yet we will nonetheless sell our children into slavery if that's what it takes to pump the last barrel of oil out of the ground for profit. And I didn't even necessarily mean that as a metaphor.

Garrett Hardin essentially said that the only way to prevent environmental destruction was through draconian means, including totalitarian government, because people will cheat even when threatened with certain and dire consequences, i.e. arrest and imprisonment. They'll cheat for the same reasons people cheat now, and they'll do so even in the face of totalitarian repression for the same reasons they ignore drug laws now, or traffic safety laws, etc. Humans are contrary animals, and when personal advantage and profit enter the equation, the only certainty is that someone will ALWAYS cheat for personal advantage.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
4. The ironic thing is that what the article says ISN'T happening, in fact IS happening.
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 08:31 PM
Feb 2012

There is in fact an enormous global grassroots movement underway. It's just that it's not being organized by anybody, so it's happening under everybody's radar - even the radar of the "environmental movement". Paul Hawken wrote about it five years ago in his book "Blessed Unrest". There's even a Wikipedia page about it.

In early 2009 I wrote this in an article about it:

[div class="excerpt" style="border:solid 1px #000000"]An individual in crisis may experience a sudden transformation or awakening as a response to an intolerable situation. The current crisis of civilization is starting to impact hundreds millions of individuals around the globe, especially since the world was plunged into the economic crisis that is further compounding our accelerating ecological, environmental, energy and social crises. The sense of imminence created by this convergence is causing enormous numbers of people to wake up and wonder WTF has been going on while we dutifully lived out the consumerist dream. While we were sleeping that dream seems to have become a nightmare as the materialist utopia we were promised morphed into a cruel, life-destroying hoax .

This uncomfortable awakening is manifesting in a massive, unpredicted global change, as reported in Paul Hawken's seminal book "Blessed Unrest" and documented on WiserEarth.org. A spontaneous global movement consisting of two million or more small, independent, grass-roots groups, working on local environmental, social justice and spiritual issues of all kinds, is spreading like an Australian wildfire through every city in every country on the face of the planet. It is the largest, most diverse, most autonomous, most exuberant, most hopeful movement humanity has ever produced.

This enormous number of individual groups, each composed of a small number of individual people, is unconsciously shifting the consciousness of the entire human enterprise. As they do that they are also fulfilling three roles that are crucial to the short, medium and long term future of humanity:

  • They are acting as "Gaia's antibodies". They arise spontaneously in response to local symptoms of dis-ease, and work to try and fix the local problems causing the symptoms. They take information, but not direction, from outside their local areas. As there are apparently so many of these groups, their action is somewhat analogous to the operation of an immune system.

  • They will act as the seed stock for a critical set of sustainable values. These groups tend to share a set of values — cooperation, consensus, nurturing, recognition of interdependence, acceptance of limits, universal justice and the respect for other life — that are precisely the ones a civilization would need to become sustainable. As the groups are so widely distributed and are not bound into a single organization, the movement is very resilient. That resilience maximizes the probability that some groups will survive to transit these values into the surrounding culture, no matter how many areas on Earth experience various changes up to and including collapse. Just as seeds sprerad their genetic material into the new plants they become, these groups act as seeds to spread their own cultural memetic material — their sustainable values. The space for these values to grow will be opened up as the guardian institutions of the old value system rupture due to the converging crisis.

  • They may act as humanity's imaginal cells. Imaginal cells accumulate in a caterpillar's body toward the end of its adolescence and trigger its metamorphosis into a butterfly. Here's a description of the process:

    When a caterpillar nears its transformation time, it begins to eat ravenously, consuming everything in sight. Tiny cells, that biologists actually call “imaginal cells,” begin to appear in the caterpillar's body. These cells are wholly different from caterpillar cells. At first, the caterpillar’s immune system perceives these new cells as enemies, and attacks them. But the imaginal cells are not deterred. They continue to appear, in ever greater numbers, recognizing each other and bonding together, until the new cells are numerous enough to organize into clumps called "imaginal disks".

    When enough imaginal disks have appeared (which is only a few percent of the caterpillar's body weight), the caterpillar’s immune system is overwhelmed. Attaching to a branch, it forms a chrysalis—the enclosing shell within which the caterpillar's body then become a nutritious soup for the growth of the butterfly.
Will these groups actually promote a broader shift in consciousness? There is evidence that this is already happening. Paul Hawken estimated in 2003 that there were 150,000 such groups world-wide. Late last year the estimate was over 2 million. The growth is truly explosive. Many, many people are being captivated by their messages of hope and healing.

There is a global miracle taking place in front of our eyes, one in which we are all being called to participate.
That was three years ago, and I estimated at the time that this unrecognized movement was growing by 30% a year, meaning that it may consist of up to four million groups today.

The fact that we're not seeing any change coming from the mainstream "environmental movement" has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that the grassroots isn't coming alive. It demonstrably is. But this movement has much in common with OWS - in fact I'd say they are simply different parts of the same movement. Like OWS it's distributed and leaderless, so it's hard to harness in the way the Empire has taught us you need to do if you want to Get Things Done.

The movement is there, and it is getting things done, but it's not the tool you need to fight an Empire. Its emergent goals are different from those of the mainstream environmentalists - the aim is not to replace one evil Empire with another kinder, gentler Empire. Its aim is to work outside the Empire entirely, to help individuals lead lives of value and to help those who are close to the earth (the grassroots) step more lightly upon Her.

Unlike the mainstream "environmental movement", this movement is in fact winning, but it's winning its own war, not the one the Empire would prefer that it fight - and lose.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Why the Environmental Mov...