Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Tue Mar 31, 2015, 10:59 PM Mar 2015

BP Oil Spill Still Harming at Least 20 Animal Species

BP Oil Spill Still Harming at Least 20 Animal Species
3/31/2015

At least 20 animal species are still suffering from the effects of the largest oil spill in U.S. history nearly five years after it occurred, according to a National Wildlife Federation report released Monday.

The common loon, blue crab, red snapper, and sperm whale are among the animals named in the NWF’s report, Five Years And Counting: Gulf Wildlife in the Aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon Disaster. Those animals only make up a small portion of the 13,000 species in the Gulf, the federation’s president told reporters on a phone call Monday, implying the difficulty of determining the spill’s total long-term impact on animals.



...The report comes just a few days after BP filed papers in federal court arguing its businesses would be threatened by fines for its historic April 2010 spill...

In recent months, Morrell has led BP’s effort to communicate that the Gulf of Mexico has “inherent resilience” when it comes to oil spills and that environmentalists are overreacting about its impacts. In October, Morrell authored an article in Politico Magazine titled “No, BP Didn’t Ruin The Gulf,” which among other things argued that the “unprecedented” clean-up response “greatly minimized the spill’s impact on wildlife and their habitats.”

The National Wildlife Federation’s report argues the contrary. It blames the spill for the deaths of 12 percent of the brown pelican population in the northern Gulf, and 32 percent of the laughing gulls in the same area. It notes that compounds from both oil and the dispersant used to clean up the oil have been found in white pelican eggs in Minnesota, Iowa, and Illinois.

The report also cited 2014 research which found two new coral reefs in the deep ocean that were impacted by the Deepwater Horizon spill, indicating a possible impact on marine ecosystems in the hard-to-analyze deep sea. It also cited the unusual string of bottlenose dolphin deaths which have been linked the the BP spill, though BP adamantly denies culpability....

http://www.nationofchange.org/2015/03/31/bp-oil-spill-still-harming-at-least-20-animal-species/


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BP Oil Spill Still Harming at Least 20 Animal Species (Original Post) RiverLover Mar 2015 OP
bbbut the Gulf was already dirty! I heard it on DU myself! MisterP Apr 2015 #1
It was (and continues to be) a toxic cesspool for the fossil fuel & agricultural industries ... Nihil Apr 2015 #2
 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
2. It was (and continues to be) a toxic cesspool for the fossil fuel & agricultural industries ...
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 05:46 AM
Apr 2015

Last edited Thu Apr 2, 2015, 06:37 AM - Edit history (1)

That doesn't excuse BP + Transocean + Halliburton from the fact that they made it a hell of a lot worse with a single event.

The fact that the dead zone around the Mississippi has nothing to do with Deepwater Horizon isn't an excuse for BP/Transocean/Halliburton.
It isn't getting fixed by BP's money though (but just grows every year without anyone caring).

The fact that there are many hundreds of leaking wells in the GoM isn't an excuse for BP/Transocean/Halliburton.
None of those are getting fixed by BP's money either (Chevron, Exxon et al are just laughing from behind their bought-out politicians).

The fact that several US states (as well as Mexico & various Latin American countries) continue to pour toxic sewage into
the GoM isn't an excuse for BP or Transocean or Halliburton to do the same. That damage isn't going to get fixed by BP's money
but the people responsible for it will never understand that if you shit on your own doorstep, it's *you* that has to clean it up.

The only reason that the plight of these poor creatures is being recognised is that the usual suspects can't make
their "traditional" money from them (either from tourism or - more frequently - from simply killing them).

*THAT* is the tragedy of human impact: No-one really gives a shit about the damage being done every single day and only
pays the tiniest bit of attention when some major event hits the headlines ...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»BP Oil Spill Still Harmin...