Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe U.S.’s energy infrastructure will need major changes, says Obama report
Hat tip, Darius Dixon, who had an article about this in Politico, "Administration Urges Upgrade of U.S. Network," that I can't find online. It was on page 15 of the print edition for Wednesday, April 22, 2015.
The U.S.s energy infrastructure will need major changes, says Obama report
By Chris Mooney April 21
@chriscmooney
The U.S. electric grid will require major changes to reposition itself for the future challenges of climate change, new technologies, and national security in coming decades, according to a first-ever Quadrennial Energy Review released by the Obama administration.
The report says our system for getting electricity stands at a strategic inflection point and requires significant change in order to accommodate more renewables and the growth of distributed energy technologies like rooftop solar. And it says much the same for the rest of the U.S.s sprawling, but often dated, power infrastructure.
The report comes at a time of major transition in the U.S. power sector. Solar and wind energy are expanding rapidly, and natural gas is gaining on coal. Meanwhile, the administration is pursuing a plan to limit greenhouse gas emissions by power plants. The new developments, combined with risks related to extreme weather, terrorism, cyber-attacks and aging infrastructure, make this a transformative moment for the nations power backbone.
In particular, the document envisions increased threats from climate extremes and cyber-hackers, but also much opportunity to create jobs, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and empower consumers if the right changes to the energy system are adopted today.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I have never seen so much interstate highway construction as over these past few years!!!
City projects, too, but every highway that I use, I-5, Hwy99, 205 and 580, seems to be under major construction.
Thanks, Obama!
Anyway, we're going to need a whole new grid, a smart grid, more storage and new transmission and distribution corridors with more distributed energy and more dispatchable renewables.
Thanks for the article!
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)which means a decentralization of the grid which is a good thing.
pscot
(21,024 posts)more privatization and offshore ownership. Or eliminating net metering to improve profits.
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)should be considered as the way to go. So what if you can't sell it back to the power oligarchs? It is a way to decentralize a vulnerable system that has helped facilitate the problems we now face. We have to think outside the box and stop planting giant windmill and solar farms all over sensitive habitat. That power generated out in the middle of far flung places still has to be transported, one way or another, to where it is going to be used.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)to put wind generators on to help supply their neighborhood.......... one block at a time plus their own solar electric input then co op a community substation for other neighborhoods......
sorry just visulizing something
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)perhaps something more like this would not require land acquisition...
http://www.aerotecture.com/projects_mlh.html
http://www.aerotecture.com/
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)You never know, if civilization can build up enough speed, maybe we can leap right over the "Chasm of Extinction" all the way to the Promised Land - a land which I have been promised is full of rainbow unicorn kitten ponies! And windmills. And solar panels!!! No wild animals or wilderness or living oceans unfortunately, but lots and lots and lots (and lots and lots and lots) of windmills and solar panels. Oh, and people. 11 billion of the fuckers, all living cheek by jowl, sucking up all that tasty renewable energy.