Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 05:10 PM Mar 2012

Responding to the Radiation Threat

http://newscenter.lbl.gov/feature-stories/2012/03/06/responding-to-the-radiation-threat/
[font face=Times, Times New Roman, Serif][font size=5]Responding to the Radiation Threat[/font]
[font size=4]Berkeley Lab Researchers Developing Promising Treatment for Safely Decontaminating Humans Exposed to Radioactive Actinides[/font]

March 06, 2012
Lynn Yarris (510) 486-5375 lcyarris@lbl.gov

[font size=3]The New York Times recently reported that in the darkest moments of the triple meltdown last year of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, Japanese officials considered the evacuation of the nearly 36 million residents of the Tokyo metropolitan area. The consideration of so drastic an action reflects the harsh fact that in the aftermath of a major radiation exposure event, such as a nuclear reactor accident or a “dirty bomb” terrorist attack, treatments for mass contamination are antiquated and very limited. The only chemical agent now available for decontamination – a compound known as DTPA – is a Cold War relic that must be administered intravenously and only partially removes some of the deadly actinides – the radioactive chemical elements spanning from actinium to lawrencium on the periodic table – that pose the greatest health threats.

Scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) are developing a much more effective alternative that decontaminates a large number of the actinides likely to be part of the radiation exposure from a nuclear plant or weapon, including plutonium, americium, curium, uranium and neptunium. Furthermore, the Berkeley Lab treatment can be administered orally in the form of a pill, a necessity for prompt treatment in the event of mass contamination. Depending on the level of radiation exposure and how soon treatment can start, one of these pills would result in the excretion of approximately 90-percent of the actinide contaminants within 24 hours. Taking one pill daily for two weeks should be enough to remove virtually all of the actinide contaminants.

“With the expanding use of nuclear power and unfortunate possibility of nuclear weapon use, there is an urgent need to develop and implement an improved therapy for actinide contamination of a large population,” says Rebecca Abergel, a chemist who leads the Bioactinide Group at Berkeley Lab’s Glenn T. Seaborg Center. “We are now in the process of demonstrating that our actinide-specific decontaminating agents are ready for clinical development.”



Abergel says the basic research and development phase of these two candidates has been completed and she and her group have started the process with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to determine what further data is needed to move into clinical trials. Typically at this stage of development a private pharmaceutical company would step in but it is difficult to attract private investors for a drug that will hopefully never be needed.

…[/font][/font]


Not sure this is such a good thing…
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Responding to the Radiation Threat (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 OP
What we need now is just some live human trials. Anyone you'd like to nuke? leveymg Mar 2012 #1
Thanks for posting this txlibdem Mar 2012 #2
It won't do much for reactor accidents anyway caraher Mar 2012 #3
Disagree Nihil Mar 2012 #4

caraher

(6,279 posts)
3. It won't do much for reactor accidents anyway
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 06:58 PM
Mar 2012

The main radioactive threats (I-131, Cs-137) aren't actinides.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
4. Disagree
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 06:00 AM
Mar 2012

Not with your (correct) classification of the main radioactive threats but with your
dismissal of an effective placebo to calm down the science-free panic that is
automatically associated with such an event. That would help substantially.

FWIW, I think that an enterprising investor could make quite a bit of money
out of the gullibility of such people (c.f., TamiFlu "shortages" and the attempted
self-poisoning with totally unnecessary "anti-radiation" iodine). Barnum was right.

And the beneficial side-effect of such support is that such a treatment would
be available for the few cases where it would be necessary (e.g., accidental
contamination for workers).


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Responding to the Radiati...