Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumSupreme Court overturns EPA air pollution rule
Coal wins, everyone who breathes air loses...
The Hill
Supreme Court overturns EPA air pollution rule
By Timothy Cama and Lydia Wheeler
The Supreme Court overturned the Obama administrations landmark air quality rule on Monday, ruling the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) did not properly consider the costs of the regulation.
In a 5-4 ruling, the justices ruled that the EPA should have taken into account the costs to utilities and others in the power sector before even deciding whether to set limits for the toxic air pollutants it regulated in 2011.
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/246423-supreme-court-overturns-epa-air-pollution-rule
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 786 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court overturns EPA air pollution rule (Original Post)
Panich52
Jun 2015
OP
haikugal
(6,476 posts)1. Insane...
Money wins, living things lose.....preview of the future.
GeorgeGist
(25,324 posts)2. Shortsighted reasoning.
geardaddy
(24,931 posts)3. This needs to be in GD to get more eyes on it. n/t
kristopher
(29,798 posts)4. They didn't "overturn" it...
What Everyone Is Getting Wrong About The Supreme Courts Mercury Pollution Ruling
BY EMILY ATKIN POSTED ON JUNE 29, 201
Despite reports to the contrary in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and briefly this publication, the Supreme Court didnt actually strike down the EPAs regulations of toxic air pollution from power plants on Monday.
What the Supreme Court did do was put the regulation which limits toxic heavy metal pollution like mercury from coal and oil-fired plants in jeopardy. In a 5-4 decision led by Justice Antonin Scalia, the court said the EPA acted unlawfully when it failed to consider how much the regulation would cost the power industry before deciding to craft the rule.
However, that doesnt mean the rule is gone. In fact, its still in place at this very moment. Right now, power plants are still required to limit their emissions of mercury, arsenic, chromium, and other toxins. A spokesperson for the EPA confirmed this to ThinkProgress.
What the Supreme Courts ruling does is send the current mercury rule to the D.C. Circuit court for further consideration. The D.C. Circuit could very well invalidate the rule. But it could also uphold it, if the court finds more harm than good would be done by repealing it, or if the agency can offer a reasonable explanation of why costs werent included early on in the administrative record.
The D.C. Circuit has often left rules in place under similar circumstances...
BY EMILY ATKIN POSTED ON JUNE 29, 201
Despite reports to the contrary in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and briefly this publication, the Supreme Court didnt actually strike down the EPAs regulations of toxic air pollution from power plants on Monday.
What the Supreme Court did do was put the regulation which limits toxic heavy metal pollution like mercury from coal and oil-fired plants in jeopardy. In a 5-4 decision led by Justice Antonin Scalia, the court said the EPA acted unlawfully when it failed to consider how much the regulation would cost the power industry before deciding to craft the rule.
However, that doesnt mean the rule is gone. In fact, its still in place at this very moment. Right now, power plants are still required to limit their emissions of mercury, arsenic, chromium, and other toxins. A spokesperson for the EPA confirmed this to ThinkProgress.
What the Supreme Courts ruling does is send the current mercury rule to the D.C. Circuit court for further consideration. The D.C. Circuit could very well invalidate the rule. But it could also uphold it, if the court finds more harm than good would be done by repealing it, or if the agency can offer a reasonable explanation of why costs werent included early on in the administrative record.
The D.C. Circuit has often left rules in place under similar circumstances...
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/06/29/3675141/no-supreme-court-did-not-invalidate-mercury-rule/