Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders: The Environment Deserves a Debate
EcoWatch
8/31/2015
Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders is speaking out against the Democratic National Committees (DNC) decision to hold only four general primary debates before the nomination, saying there needs to be room for specific topics, such as the environment.
.@BernieSanders isnt sure that Hillary Clinton can take on billionaires and says the same old wont cut it http://t.co/rGxvJYiBlM
State of the Union (@CNNSotu) August 30, 2015
In an interview with CNNs State of the Union (H/T ThinkProgress) on Sunday, Sanders explained, I think environmentalists deserve a debate so we could talk about how we move aggressively to transform our energy system away from fossil fuel.
....Snip...
Sheril Kirshenbaum, executive director of ScienceDebate, told ThinkProgress that she thinks voters should know where presidential candidates stand on a variety of science-related issues such as climate change, health and energy.
People talk about these issues as if theyre just science issues and theyre really just human challenges, she said. No matter if youre a Republican or a Democrat, theyre going to affect you and your family.
As Evan McMurry wrote for AlterNet, Sanders is recognized for his glowing record on climate change, and even if he does not win the nomination, he can influence the debate, in part by framing climate change as a primary issue.
Also during his interview with CNN, Sanders further expressed the urgency to address the planets climate crisis and the necessity to shift away from dirty energy....
Read more~
http://ecowatch.com/2015/08/31/bernie-sanders-climate-debate/
That is one terrific idea. One debate, all on environmental issues. Wouldn't that be amazing?!
It's my opinion though, it will never happen. At least not for 2016.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Environmentalism used to be hot. Then we cleaned up the air, so you can actually see more than a block in most major cities. The rivers don't catch fire and burn for days, the way they used to. The trees along the highway no longer die from lead poisoning. And so on. We're complacent about the environment because, in spite of the worst efforts of the Reagan clan, we cleaned things up well enough to push the issue to the back burner.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)How about that there's PLENTY of interest but a mSm media black out on it.
The earth is on FIRE. We just had the hottest month on record. People can't swim in the lakes & rivers because of the algae. Our bats, bees, butterflies are being killed off. Tree species are dying. The ocean is suffocating & acidifying. I could go on & on & on. Your post astounds me. And saddens me.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Yes, Americans may "warm up" to the issue once more. The only thing about climate change is, it's not as dramatic and self-evident as the burning rivers and smog-choked skies. It requires a little more awareness, and it's more complicated for journalists because it involves complex scientific findings. GMO agriculture is also a possible hot issue. Interest in the environment could become an important political topic once again. That would be nice.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)Bernie is going to have to shake all the apple trees himself and get the issues out there. He's done really well with economic inequality and social justice, he can keep moving with anti-war and climate change...and we'll hear very little from the other candidates in the mean time.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)I wish he got more press.
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]A lot of people will have to be personally and dramatically scared shitless before they experience a change in perspective on climate change and the environment.
But don't worry ... it's coming.