Environment & Energy

XemaSab

(60,212 posts) Sat Mar 10, 2012, 06:33 PM Mar 2012

Ladies and Gentlemen, place your bets!

How low will it go?

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ladies and Gentlemen, place your bets! (Original Post) XemaSab Mar 2012 OP

I bet scary levels. Nt xchrom Mar 2012 #1

I'll go for big but thin Dead_Parrot Mar 2012 #2

I'm with you. Not a huge drop in area, but MASS will continue its free-fall. Systematic Chaos Mar 2012 #3

I'm with you fellers XemaSab Mar 2012 #5

is it that time already? phantom power Mar 2012 #4

I'm an optimist OnlinePoker Mar 2012 #6

xchrom

(108,903 posts)

1. I bet scary levels. Nt

Reply to XemaSab (Original post)

Sat Mar 10, 2012, 06:38 PM

Mar 2012

Dead_Parrot

(14,478 posts)

2. I'll go for big but thin

Reply to XemaSab (Original post)

Sat Mar 10, 2012, 06:46 PM

Mar 2012

13.2M km², 3.8K km³.

edit: "big" is relative, obviously.

Systematic Chaos

(8,601 posts)

3. I'm with you. Not a huge drop in area, but MASS will continue its free-fall.

Reply to Dead_Parrot (Reply #2)

Sat Mar 10, 2012, 09:55 PM

Mar 2012

And pass that ...

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)

5. I'm with you fellers

Reply to Systematic Chaos (Reply #3)

Sat Mar 10, 2012, 11:23 PM

Mar 2012

Third or fourth lowest area; lowest volume.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)

4. is it that time already?

Reply to XemaSab (Original post)

Sat Mar 10, 2012, 10:35 PM

Mar 2012

Continued mass decline is an easy bet. I will be bold and predict a new record area low as well.

OnlinePoker

(5,724 posts)

6. I'm an optimist

Reply to XemaSab (Original post)

Mon Mar 12, 2012, 11:36 PM

Mar 2012

I say low of 4.2 million sq miles and a volume anomaly based on PIOMAS of about -9000 kilometres cubed (up from about -9700 km3 last year).

?%3C?php%20echo%20time%28%29%20?

Reply to this discussion