Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 08:10 AM Nov 2015

Impacted Landowners Demand EPA Revise Flawed Fracking Study

Impacted Landowners Demand EPA Revise Flawed Fracking Study
Wenonah Hauter | October 30, 2015

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Scientific Advisory Board met this week to review the agency’s draft assessment of the impact of fracking on drinking water resources, but the largely academic exercise got a dose of reality from residents of Dimock, Pennsylvania; Pavillion, Wyoming; and Parker County, Texas who have fought for years to get U.S. EPA to act.

Inexplicably, their cases of contamination were excluded in the thousands of pages that make up the EPA’s assessment. Given only five minutes each, the residents demanded that the EPA stop ignoring their cases.




Ray Kemble, an affected landowner and former gas industry worker, testified, “In 2008, gas drilling caused my water to become poisoned. The Pennsylvania DEP and the EPA confirmed this contamination, but abandoned us in 2012 and did not even include us in their long-term study. I am here today to demand that EPA recognize us, include our case in this study, and reopen the investigation.”

John Fenton, a rancher and affected landowner in Pavillion also spoke out. “When EPA launched its national study of fracking’s drinking water impacts, we thought they’d look first here in Pavillion where they’d already found pollution. But instead they ignored us without explanation. Science means taking the facts as they are. But EPA seems to be intent on finding the facts to support the conclusion they’ve already reached—‘fracking is safe.’”



....big snip....

Some of the Scientific Advisory Board members are listening, with one member describing the EPA’s topline finding as “out of left field” and a “non sequitur relative to the body of the report.” But at the same time, the oil and gas industry is well represented on the board—several repeatedly used “we” and “industry” interchangeably as they chimed in in defense of fracking.

The EPA has been unresponsive and is failing to uphold its own basic mission to protect human health and the environment. It’s time for the agency to finally step up and serve the people, not the oil and gas industry. They could start by having a face-to-face with Administrator Gina McCarthy and affected individuals, rather than pretending they don’t exist. And the Obama administration must stop greenwashing fracking and acknowledge that it’s a dirty, polluting source of energy that harms our water, our climate, and our communities.

http://ecowatch.com/2015/10/30/epa-flawed-fracking-report/


The video shows some very compelling testimony by one of the impacted citizens, Ray Kemble.

The truly disturbing overtake of our govt by Moneyed Interests is on full display here.
These citizens testifying, begging the EPA to reopen their flawed study, should have already been protected by the EPA.

As Hope says in the video above, "Its a difficult thing to watch as an American, this kind of cover-up, this level of cover-up."



*xposted in video & multimedia



2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Impacted Landowners Demand EPA Revise Flawed Fracking Study (Original Post) RiverLover Nov 2015 OP
that's always the M.O.: a TOTALLY objective and scientific study just HAPPENS to line up with MisterP Nov 2015 #1
Good summation, MisterP RiverLover Nov 2015 #2

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
1. that's always the M.O.: a TOTALLY objective and scientific study just HAPPENS to line up with
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 03:20 PM
Nov 2015

every one of the corporate talking points

a decade later it's retracted "on new evidence" and we're lectured on how science always cleans up its own messes and we shouldn't doubt The System

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Impacted Landowners Deman...