Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumWhen Planting Trees Hurts the Environment
http://www.thenation.com/article/when-planting-trees-hurts-the-environment/But a close look at the Uruguayan experience reveals that planting a tree is not always a good thing. It depends on what species gets planted and where, who plants it, and who owns the land.
Thus, even with the best of intentions, without local land ownership and a mechanism to ensure that each tree-planting project under the umbrella of Initiative 20×20 is proceeding as planned, the unintended consequences could be severe.
At La Cascada, María Muñoz objected to planting trees. She was concerned they might drain the estates groundwater, invade the natural grassland, and erode the topsoil. But, more than anything, she worried about destroying the landscape.
If tomorrow, I want to look out and all I can see are trees she didnt really like that idea, Pancho explains. The idea of change worried Mamá the most, because she was the one who enjoyed the view the most.
<snip>
But not everyone approves. A tree farm isnt a forest, some environmentalists argue. While diverse, native forests sequester carbon in the trees, the undergrowth, and the soil, tree farms sequester carbon only in the trees themselves. In that case, the only way to add to the carbon stock is by adding land, says Matt Palmer, an ecologist at Columbia Universityand youve set yourself a pretty low ceiling for what sequestration is possible. Furthermore, environmentalists argue, the focus on a global calculation of atmospheric carbon can obscure local effects on ecosystems, economies, and families.
Just because you can plant a tree somewhere doesnt mean you should, Palmer concludes.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Thanks for posting!
hunter
(38,322 posts)... and burn explosively. They also tend to drop huge limbs at entirely random times.
Not many plants can live underneath or near these trees, poison oak being an exception.
But people still plant eucalyptus, and even more people complain when existing eucalyptus groves are removed in favor of native species.
eridani
(51,907 posts)I remember the fires in Oakland and the disastrous role eucalyptus played in spreading it.
hunter
(38,322 posts)My parents used to have a small farm where citrus farmers had planted them as wind breaks, and Chevron oil had them for reasons known only to Chevron, but probably to keep access roads and such from turning to mud in winter.
The trees do very nearly explode in fires. I've seen that in person. They push natural fire cycles in California plant communities to extremes.
NickB79
(19,257 posts)Without fires to keep the area open and treeless, it's grown into a savanna landscape. It looks nice, but the trees give eagles, hawks and owls a place to roost and spot sage grouse, making them easier to kill. It said there were plans to start mass clearing of trees and start more controlled burns.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)Reintroduction attempts failed because of too many trees providing perches for predators.