Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,592 posts)
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:21 AM Dec 2015

85% Of Male Smallmouth Bass Tested At 19 NWR Sites Across NE US Were Intersex - 27% Of Largemouth

Eighty-five percent of male smallmouth bass tested in or nearby 19 National Wildlife Refuges in the U.S. Northeast had signs of female reproductive parts, according to a new federal study. The study, led by the U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, also reported that 27 percent of male largemouth bass in the testing sites were intersex.

The study is the first of its kind in National Wildlife Refuges and adds to growing evidence that endocrine disrupting chemicals are getting into U.S. lakes, rivers, streams and reservoirs—no matter how protected the waters seem. And such contamination seems to affect the reproductive development of some fish species, which can lead to threatened populations.

In the case of the bass in this study, those considered “intersex” either had a protein that is used to make egg yolk typically found in females, or immature egg cells in their testes, said co author Fred Pinkney, a biologist with the U.S. Fisheries and Wildlife. “The eggs were in the very, very early stages,” he added. But any change to fish reproductive systems could possibly threaten overall fish populations and ability to properly reproduce.

During the fall seasons of 2008 to 2010, the researchers tested a total of 118 male smallmouth bass from 12 locations and 85 percent were intersex. They tested an additional 173 male largemouth bass from 27 sampling sites and 27 percent were intersex. It’s not entirely clear why the bass were intersex as the researchers did not test the waters for specific chemicals, said lead author Luke Iwanowicz, a research biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey. However, the suspected culprits of the sex changes are endocrine disrupting compounds.

EDIT

http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/2015/dec/endocrine-disruption-fish-rivers-national-wildlife-refuge

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
85% Of Male Smallmouth Bass Tested At 19 NWR Sites Across NE US Were Intersex - 27% Of Largemouth (Original Post) hatrack Dec 2015 OP
Here's an old National Geographic article before they were sold down the river Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #1
From the article .... thanx for posting Botany Dec 2015 #2

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
1. Here's an old National Geographic article before they were sold down the river
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:35 AM
Dec 2015




Sex-Changing Chemicals Found in Potomac River


for National Geographic News
January 22, 2007

The researchers also found chemicals from pesticides and flame retardants as well as fragrances commonly found in products such as soaps, antiperspirants, and deodorants.

"We analyzed blood plasma of 30 smallmouth bass from six sites," Chambers said. "All the fish contained at least one of the polluting chemicals, including fish that were not intersex."


http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/01/070122-sex-change.html

also

pollutants can cause gender-bending effects

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6343-pollution-triggers-bizarre-behaviour-in-animals/

Botany

(70,576 posts)
2. From the article .... thanx for posting
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 10:12 AM
Dec 2015

It’s not entirely clear why the bass were intersex as the researchers did not test the waters for specific chemicals, said lead author Luke Iwanowicz, a research biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey.

However, the suspected culprits of the sex changes are endocrine disrupting compounds.

This includes hormones, industrial chemicals and pesticides that are or mimic estrogen hormones. These compounds enter rivers and streams via permitted effluents, stormwater and agricultural runoff, and wastewater treatment plants, where excreted birth control and natural estrogens pass through relatively un-altered.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»85% Of Male Smallmouth Ba...