Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumBad news: Scientists say we could be underestimating Arctic methane emissions
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/12/21/bad-news-scientists-say-we-could-be-underestimating-arctic-methane-emissions/Arctic permafrost has become a recent star in the climate change conversation, capturing the attention of scientists, activists and policymakers alike because of its ability to emit large quantities of carbon dioxide as well as methane a particularly potent though relatively short-lived greenhouse gas when it thaws. As temperatures rise in the Arctic, scientists are increasingly concerned that permafrost will become a major contributor to the greenhouse gas emissions driving global warming.
Studies of permafrost emissions are important in both estimating current levels of greenhouse gas emissions and making predictions for the future. So far, most studies have focused on the way permafrost behaves in the summer, when Arctic temperatures are at their highest. But a new paper in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences says weve been overlooking the importance of cold-season emissions of methane gas in particular and possibly underestimating their impact in the future.
The cold period in general is the time of the year that is warming the fastest in these Arctic ecosystems, said the new studys lead author Donatella Zona, an assistant professor at San Diego State University and research fellow at the University of Sheffield.
Until recently, scientists have known very little about how much methane is released by permafrost during the cold winter months, she said. But she noted, Really, if were thinking about the future of climate change, we need to understand if this time of the year is important.
(more)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 966 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bad news: Scientists say we could be underestimating Arctic methane emissions (Original Post)
Recoverin_Republican
Dec 2015
OP
Yet again we are hearing "sooner", "faster", "worse", and "we underestimated..."
Binkie The Clown
Dec 2015
#1
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)1. Yet again we are hearing "sooner", "faster", "worse", and "we underestimated..."
We are so screwed, and still people don't "believe in it", yet they believe in a magic sky daddy who will save us all.
Duppers
(28,127 posts)2. Zactly!
daleanime
(17,796 posts)3. kick, kick, kick.....