Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumUpdate on fishing off Fukushima
Fishermen on the Fukushima Prefecture coast are currently operating on a trial basis, targeting 71 species of marine animals deemed safe by authorities.
The fish catch in the region in 2014 was about 740 tons, a mere 3 percent of the annual haul before the 2011 disaster.
Prefectural authorities in 2015 tested 8,577 marine specimens for radioactive substances. Only four of the specimens exceeded government standards for contamination.
http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/recovery/AJ201601080053
The fish catch in the region in 2014 was about 740 tons, a mere 3 percent of the annual haul before the 2011 disaster.
Prefectural authorities in 2015 tested 8,577 marine specimens for radioactive substances. Only four of the specimens exceeded government standards for contamination.
http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/recovery/AJ201601080053
Yet there are people worried about the fish off the coast of California?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 846 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Update on fishing off Fukushima (Original Post)
FBaggins
Jan 2016
OP
Govt. Scientists Admit They Deceived the Public About Fracking's Impact on Drinking Water
saturnsring
Jan 2016
#5
OffWithTheirHeads
(10,337 posts)1. "Government standards for contamination"
Like in Flint?
I no longer believe ANYTHING the government tells me.
Duppers
(28,126 posts)4. Zactly. nt
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)2. Um, yes, we're still concerned.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)3. Give into your fears. More fish for me.
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)5. Govt. Scientists Admit They Deceived the Public About Fracking's Impact on Drinking Water
hunter
(38,326 posts)6. Bummer for the fish.
If I was a fish I'd rather be slightly radioactive and alive than dead on a dinner plate.