Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(26,756 posts)
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 02:57 PM Jan 2016

Nuclear Energy Facilities Set Reliability Record in 2015, Estimate Shows


U.S. nuclear energy facilities generated electricity at a record high level of reliability in 2015, according to preliminary estimates, again demonstrating nuclear energy's value to consumers, the stability of the electric grid and to the nation's economy.

Ninety-nine nuclear power plants operating in 30 states posted an estimated average capacity factor of 91.9 percent, based on preliminary 2015 data compiled by the Nuclear Energy Institute. That surpasses the industry's prior record set in 2007 by one-tenth of a percentage point. Capacity factor measures the total electricity generated as a percentage of potential generation for the entire year.

Actual electricity production from nuclear energy facilities last year was the fifth-highest ever, at an estimated 797.9 billion kilowatt-hours (kwh). The industry's record high electricity generation came in 2010, when the 104 reactors then operating produced 806.9 billion kwh of electricity while posting an industry average capacity factor of 90.9 percent.

...snip...

Nuclear energy facilities for the past two decades have annually produced about one-fifth of America's electricity supplies, even as total electricity demand has increased significantly. Because of their electric sector-leading capacity factors, they have done so even though nuclear power plants constitute only about 10 percent of the nation's installed electric generating capacity.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/19/globe-newswire-nuclear-energy-facilities-set-reliability-record-in-2015-estimate-shows.html
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nuclear Energy Facilities Set Reliability Record in 2015, Estimate Shows (Original Post) FBaggins Jan 2016 OP
The inflexibility of baseload coal and nuclear is not an asset. kristopher Jan 2016 #1

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
1. The inflexibility of baseload coal and nuclear is not an asset.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jan 2016

On top of cost, their lack of flexibility is not compatible with the grid we're moving towards.

There are no meaningful technical limitations on moving to renewable energy sources, but when we are dealing with no fuel cost sources of generation the needs of the grid results in different priorities and new valuations on the operational characteristics of so called 'baseload' plants.

In a renewable grid where there are low build costs and no fuel costs involved in production, the most effective strategy is to build out a distributed renewable infrastructure that shuts down the fueled sources of generation.

As no-fuel renewable penetration increases, they systematically shut down the fueled sources in order of least flexible to most flexible. Eventually you arrive at a grid consisting of generation from no-fuel variable renewables, storage (mostly end use), and "dispatchable" renewables - both hydro and bio-fueled generation.


What will it cost to build Southern Co.’s new nuclear reactors at Plant Vogtle?
January 11th, 2016 › Nuclear › Sara Barczak ›

So, what is the current cost estimate for building two new Toshiba-Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear reactors at Southern Company’s Plant Vogtle near Waynesboro, Georgia along the Savannah River? It seems like it should be a simple question but it clearly is not. And the answer depends on when you ask, who you ask, what your question is exactly asking, how you ask the question and how much patience you have to wait for an actual answer. ...

Here are the highlights (or “lowlights”) to save you time:
- The project is at least 39-months delayed; though more than five years in, only 26 percent of construction is complete.
- With more delays come more cost increases, in excess of $2 million per day for Georgia Power’s share of the project (they are 45.7 percent owners).
-Georgia Power’s estimated cost is now over $9.5 billion, more than $3 billion above the certified cost of $6.113 billion.
- All project benefits have been eliminated by the detriments (e.g. increased financing costs, replacement fuel costs, etc.).
- Approximately $21 billion was mentioned as the current total cost estimate for the entire Vogtle project, a staggering increase since the $14.1 billion estimate in 2009 (this figure does not include costs associated with even further delays).

http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2016/01/11/how-much-does-it-cost-to-build-southern-co-s-new-nuclear-reactors-at-plant-vogtle/
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Nuclear Energy Facilities...