Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumTrump, Cruz And LaRouche On Climate - Spot The Difference, If You Can . .
EDIT
Second, Id counsel the pundit class now covering this sorriest of presidential elections to seek the wisdom of the man whose multiple presidential runs were built on a fortress of wild conspiracies. Now mostly forgotten, 93 year-old Lyndon LaRouche was a candidate in every presidential election from 1976 to 2004, either as a Democrat, an Independent, or under the flag of his own U.S. Labor Party.
In 1992, he ran his campaign from a federal prison in Minnesota following his conviction on credit card fraud and obstruction of justice. For a time, fate conspired to give him disgraced televangelist Jim Bakker as a cellmate. In his autobiography, Bakker wrote, to say that Lyndon was slightly paranoid would be like saying the Titanic had a bit of a leak. Oh, could Lyndon LaRouche spin conspiracies. Queen Elizabeth, Henry Kissinger, and the World Wildlife Fund, he said, controlled the worldwide heroin trade. Her Majesty has also held every U.S. President since Harry Truman by the short ones, as if the Brits never really surrendered at Yorktown. And popular culture, represented by The Beatles, Harry Potter and Pokémon among others, is a vast and centralized mind control effort to steer the worlds youth into either violence or torpor.
EDIT
Lyndon LaRouche is worth mentioning here because what Cruz and Trump have said about climate change is competitive with his lunacy. Unlike LaRouche, these men have a genuine shot at leading America and setting its climate agenda. As his star continues to rise, Trump has uncharacteristically mellowed on climate denial, telling a gullible Fox News interviewer last year that the Chinese line was a joke. But he still deploys the word hoax on a regular basis, and drops a soundbite and a tweet on every cold weather day to refute climate change.
Cruz has doubled down, comparing himself to the persecuted Galileo and adding a parallel conspiracy theory about climate scientists, saying theyre only in it for the money. In the debate over global warming, far too often politicians in Washington and for that matter, a number of scientists receiving large government grants disregard the science and data and instead push political ideology, he told NPR. This is particularly ironic, given Cruzs deep financial support from oil and gas men.
Either way, its chilling. The kind of paranoia and delusion that once resided on the fringe is winning presidential primaries and caucuses. And in case you may think we dont have Lyndon LaRouche to kick around anymore, his think tank, the Schiller Institute, published a paper last September accusing the still-prolific Queen Elizabeth of strong-arming the Pope into stumping on climate change as a population control measure despite the Catholic Churchs singular stance against population control even on a personal level. So Lyndon LaRouche is a has-been, an ex-con, a tinfoil-hatted crackpot who was quadrennially laughed off the national stage. Ted Cruz and Donald Trump are serious contenders for the presidency. Other than that, on climate change, Im not sure I can tell the three of them apart.
EDIT/END
http://www.dailyclimate.org/tdc-newsroom/2016/feb/opinion-donald-ted2019s-excellent-climate