Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:43 PM Feb 2016

Low-Carbon Policies Could Save US Lives (up to 175,000 by 2030)

http://today.duke.edu/2016/02/lowcarbon
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Low-Carbon Policies Could Save US Lives[/font]

[font size=4]Study suggests policies could prevent up to 175,000 deaths by 2030[/font]

February 22, 2016

[font size=3]Durham, NC - Reducing U.S. climate emissions enough to avoid a 2-degree Celsius increase in global warming could prevent up to 175,000 pollution-related premature deaths nationwide by 2030 and generate health benefits of about $250 billion annually, according to a new analysis by researchers at Duke University and the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

“Many people view climate change as a future problem, but our analysis shows that reducing emissions that cause warming -- many of which also contribute to air pollution -- would benefit public health here and now,” said Drew T. Shindell, professor of climate sciences at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment.

When longer-term global health impacts are taken into account, the benefits of reducing U.S. emissions could be 5 to 10 times larger than the estimated cost of implementing necessary policies or technologies, Shindell noted.

The researchers published their peer-reviewed analysis Feb. 22 in the journal Nature Climate Change.

…[/font][/font]
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Low-Carbon Policies Could Save US Lives (up to 175,000 by 2030) (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Feb 2016 OP
K&R pscot Feb 2016 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Low-Carbon Policies Could...