Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumPot is power hungry: why the marijuana industry's energy footprint is growing
Source: The Guardian
Pot is power hungry: why the marijuana industry's energy footprint is growing
Melanie Sevcenko
Saturday 27 February 2016 13.58 GMT
Marijuana might look and smell natural, but its ecological footprint is anything but green. Pot is power hungry.
The $3.5bn cannabis industry is one of the nations most energy intensive, often demanding 24-hour indoor lighting rigs, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems at multiplying grow sites.
As many as 10 states could legalize recreational marijuana this year, which means the resultant electricity consumption could cause problems for public utilities and city officials.
A study by scientist Evan Mills, with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, revealed that legalized indoor marijuana-growing operations account for 1% of total electricity use in the US, at a cost of $6bn per year. Annually, such consumption produces 15m tons of greenhouse gas emissions (CO2), equal to that of three million average cars.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Cannabis growers are moving slowly toward energy efficient practices, largely out of fear for how changes might affect the quality of their product.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/27/marijuana-industry-huge-energy-footprint
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)One of the main reasons pot's grown indoors is to keep it away from prying eyes of
nosey neighbors and/or law enforcement.
I know this is not true of ALL indoor grows, but just saying, legalization would help
a lot of this.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)ghostsinthemachine
(3,569 posts)They ban outdoor growing and encourage indoor growing. Especially in the recent rush of ordinances in CA, ahead of the new laws passed by the legislature.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)For one. Remove restrictions on outdoor growing for two. There are solutions if we really want to find them but I'm not convinced America is serious. Not even close.
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)Government is too busy trying to regulate and tax it.