Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,084 posts)
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 11:37 AM Apr 2016

You’ve got $50 billion for transit. Now how should you spend it?


from the Transport Politic:



[font size="1"]» Metropolitan Seattle plans to offer its voters the chance to fund a large new transit expansion program. But are the projects chosen for initial funding the right ones?[/font]


Building a regional fixed-guideway transit network is no quick or easy feat, at least in the United States in our era of high costs and relatively slow construction timelines. Seattle’s first light rail line was funded by voters in 1996 but didn’t open its first section for thirteen years; the full extent of the initial line just opened last month, a full twenty years later.

Despite the slow pace, residents of big cities across the country are hungry for more, hoping to spread the benefits of rapid transit to other parts of their respective metropolitan areas. That impulse motivated Seattle residents to approve the $18 billion Sound Transit 2 package (named after the regional transit agency) in 2008, which will extend “Link” light rail north, south, and east, creating a 50-mile light rail network by 2023.

It has also encouraged Sound Transit to propose a third package of projects, expected to be submitted for voter approval this November. Sound Transit 3 (ST3) would support $50 billion in investments, to be completed by 2041.

Excitement about adding light rail—and the region does apparently want it, given the massive ridership produced by the opening of new stations last month—has nevertheless been countered by skepticism about the value of the draft ST3 plan put forward by the transit agency’s planners and leaders.

Their questions are relevant to any region that’s considering major new transit expansion projects: If the projects the plan includes aren’t ideal, are they worth paying for? If the projects are built in the wrong order, are the links scheduled for the back of the line worth waiting for? ..............(more)

http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2016/04/06/youve-got-50-billion-for-transit-now-how-should-you-spend-it/




3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You’ve got $50 billion for transit. Now how should you spend it? (Original Post) marmar Apr 2016 OP
We're doing the same thing here in $iliValley, but we only get $6 billion KamaAina Apr 2016 #1
Well, I'd probably fly first class more often. Adsos Letter Apr 2016 #2
steel on steel MisterP Apr 2016 #3
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
1. We're doing the same thing here in $iliValley, but we only get $6 billion
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 12:26 PM
Apr 2016

from a half-cent sales tax on the November ballot.

http://www.envisionsv.org/challenge

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Public Transportation and Smart Growth»You’ve got $50 billion fo...