Foreign Affairs
Related: About this forumUS military:The west has normalised racist wars - but you can’t solve complex problems with 1,000lb
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/30/west-racist-wars-bombs-radicalisation-frankie-boyleRadicalisation is our new dirty word in the US and UK, yet radical change is needed. Heres an idea: stop trying to fix the world with high explosives
US military:The west has normalised racist wars - but you cant solve complex problems with 1,000lb bombs
Frankie Boyle
Tuesday 30 June 2015 12.54 EDT
I suppose that whether this article prompted by the Charleston shootings feels topical enough will depend on whether America has another mass shooting before it goes to print. If youre in the US, theres a fair chance it will seem dated because you are actually being gunned down as you read it, so Ill try to get straight to the point. Its surely worth wondering whether its time to retire the flag that has for so long been a rallying point for racists and murderers, the stars and stripes. Theres a genuine question to be asked here: what responsibility does the US state bear for the Charleston shootings when racist murder seems to be part of its policing strategy and most of its foreign policy?
Occasionally I wonder whether at some point in the past 100 years the US gave the rest of the world a safe word and weve simply forgotten it. Or maybe were just saying it wrong (Aluminium? Im sure you said it was aluminium ...) Hillary Clinton has been speaking out against the racist terrorism of Dylann Roof despite being the architect of the US military intervention in Libya. The USs record of invasions, assassinations and government overthrows is racist, I think. Imagining that you can kill people and seize control of their resources without believing them to be inferior requires a certain amount of intellectual flexibility. The same sort of intellectual flexibility that allows people to express grief for the migrants who drown in the Mediterranean and hatred for the ones who survive.
~snip~
There are many indicators of advanced civilisations, but unthinking hero worship of the military isnt one of them. The US, like the UK, has been forced to move away from a conscription army and now has a mercenary army. Its the reason you dont get war poets any more.
~snip~
Of course our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Maybe Ill even give them the benefit of the doubt and concede that they are just naive do-gooders trying to bring the world peace and stability through the medium of high explosives. What gets me is that the new dirty word in the west is radicalisation, as if radical change wasnt obviously needed; as if the status quo has any decency, or is even survivable. Its not actually difficult to see solutions to the USs problems: children can do it, until we educate them out of it. Internationally, I propose the radical step of not trying to solve complex political problems with 1,000lb bombs; domestically, I propose they start addressing inequality by paying reparations for slavery. Im well aware that in a society where war and discrimination are now almost entirely normalised, both options sound like madness.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)or the Mid-East wars? Maybe the author should have decided on a topic BEFORE writing an article.
"The USs record of invasions, assassinations and government overthrows is racist, I think."
Suuuuuure. The Cold War had racist motivations. Riiiiiight.
"Were not the aggressor in countries such as Iraq, were actually defending Iraq. From the Iraqis. The most obvious anti-war argument that none of this has ever worked just doesnt seem to come up."
I guess, the author is happy with idly sitting by as slavering, mass-murdering and history-torching terrorists create their own bandit-kingdom in Iraq. Guess what? The Iraqis aren't happy with that.
Just a horrible, condescending article with a sensationalistic, misleading headline posing as a morality-piece.