Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 09:49 AM Jul 2015

Afghanistan peace process: Comforting ‘the Warrior’

---

It is an irony of history to see how utterly frivolous the decade of war has ultimately turned out to be. Not only are the Taliban — the very ‘savage’ force this war was fought against — being coaxed into accepting an offer of share in power, but the very process of peace dialogue is being presented as a sign of success.

Yes, it is a success! The dirty war is certainly inching towards its end. But the end does not appear to be better than the war itself because the ‘savage Talib’ is again on the rise.

However, the ‘savage Talib’ is no longer a ‘terrorist,’ he is an ‘insurgent’ now. Amid cheers of peace, the common Afghan continues to suffer materially and non-materially as there is hardly anyone to listen to what he has to say about what he wants for his country. The so-called peace process excludes him and consequently reduces him into insignificance.

It is not to suggest that the war should not come to an end. But what do we do when the end itself starts becoming a matter of grave concern — a new problem in itself to deal with? The so-called ‘peace process’, which Pakistani officials hailed as ‘ground-breaking’, is a recipe of political domination of Afghanistan in geo-political sense.

http://atimes.com/2015/07/afghanistan-peace-process-comforting-the-warrior/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Afghanistan peace process: Comforting ‘the Warrior’ (Original Post) bemildred Jul 2015 OP
We were unable to do much in the 14 years we've been there. unhappycamper Aug 2015 #1
It's classic really. bemildred Aug 2015 #2

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
1. We were unable to do much in the 14 years we've been there.
Sat Aug 1, 2015, 07:32 AM
Aug 2015

Except start a religious war between the Shia and Sunni sects.

Think of it - almost a generation of Americans have always been at war.

And the Veterans Administration is begging for more dollars to treat the veterans who were damaged in this folly.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. It's classic really.
Sat Aug 1, 2015, 07:50 AM
Aug 2015

And predicted before it happened.

I remember posting a story from 2002 wherein Vo Nguyen Giap said we would lose just like in Vietnam. And I considered it was obvious then we were going to accomplish squat because we refuse to learn squat. Belligerence is not a strategy, and as a tactic it is very weak, it makes you predictable and exposes you to ambushes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%B5_Nguy%C3%AAn_Gi%C3%A1p

Audacity is all very well but it doesn't win wars.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Afghanistan peace process...