Foreign Affairs
Related: About this forumA Special Relationship: The United States Is Teaming Up With Al Qaeda, Again--Alexander Cockburn
A Special Relationship
The United States Is Teaming Up With Al Qaeda, Again
By Andrew Cockburn
December 14, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - "Harpers"
- One morning early in 1988, Ed McWilliams, a foreign-service officer posted to the American Embassy in Kabul, heard the thump of a massive explosion from somewhere on the other side of the city. It was more than eight years after the Russian invasion of Afghanistan, and the embassy was a tiny enclave with only a handful of diplomats. McWilliams, a former Army intelligence operative, had made it his business to venture as much as possible into the Soviet-occupied capital. Now he set out to see what had happened.
It was obviously something big: although the explosion had taken place on the other side of Sher Darwaza, a mountain in the center of Kabul, McWilliams had heard it clearly. After negotiating a maze of narrow streets on the south side of the city, he found the site. A massive car bomb, designed to kill as many civilians as possible, had been detonated in a neighborhood full of Hazaras, a much-persecuted minority.
McWilliams took pictures of the devastation, headed back to the embassy, and sent a report to Washington. It was very badly received not because someone had launched a terrorist attack against Afghan civilians, but because McWilliams had reported it. The bomb, it turned out, had been the work of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the mujahedeen commander who received more CIA money and support than any other leader of the Afghan rebellion. The attack, the first of many, was part of a CIA-blessed scheme to put pressure on the Soviet presence in Kabul. Informing the Washington bureaucracy that Hekmatyars explosives were being deployed to kill civilians was therefore entirely unwelcome.
Those were Gulbuddins bombs, McWilliams, a Rhode Islander with a gift for laconic understatement, told me recently. He was supposed to get the credit for this. In the meantime, the former diplomat recalled, the CIA pressured him to report a little less specifically about the humanitarian consequences of those vehicle bombs.
I tracked down McWilliams, now retired to the remote mountains of southern New Mexico, because the extremist Islamist groups currently operating in Syria and Iraq called to mind the extremist Islamist groups whom we lavishly supported in Afghanistan during the 1980s. Hekmatyar, with his documented fondness for throwing acid in womens faces, would have had nothing to learn from Al Qaeda. When a courageous ABC News team led by my wife, Leslie Cockburn, interviewed him in 1993, he had beheaded half a dozen people earlier that day. Later, he killed their translator.
In the wake of 9/11, the story of U.S. support for militant Islamists against the Soviets became something of a touchy subject. Former CIA and intelligence officials like to suggest that the agency simply played the roles of financier and quartermaster. In this version of events, the dirty work the actual management of the campaign and the dealings with rebel groups was left to Pakistans Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). It was Pakistans fault that at least 70 percent of total U.S. aid went to the fundamentalists, even if the CIA demanded audited accounts on a regular basis.
The beneficiaries, however, have not always been content to play along with the official story. Asked by the ABC News team whether he remembered Charlie Wilson, the Texas congressman later immortalized in print and onscreen as the patron saint of the mujahedeen, Hekmatyar fondly recalled that he was a good friend. He was all the time supporting our jihad. Others expressed the same point in a different way. Abdul Haq, a mujahedeen commander who might today be described as a moderate rebel, complained loudly during and after the Soviet war in Afghanistan about American policy. The CIA would come with a big load of ammunition and money and supplies to these [fundamentalist] groups. We would tell them, What the hell is going on? You are creating a monster in this country.
Continued at........
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article43724.htm
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)what could possibly go wrong?
KoKo
(84,711 posts)We have to keep looking and waiting to see "What Comes Next."
We wait for the "Reasoned Minds" to make sense and do something in Diplomacy to try to Push Back on whats coming undone. While "The Uninformed People" have so little power and depend on the "Experts" to make it All work out?
The "John Kerry" Post here.....has a bit of it........But...its a Long, Wonky read. Best to go to the middle and move on in the middle about the ME. Although Kerry's background and surroundings are very interesting.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/113314768
KoKo
(84,711 posts)But, well worth the Watch for the Other Guests including Gareth Porter who comes in later in the show. It's a good watch for differing opinions.
Syrian minefield
Published time: 16 Dec, 2015 06:55Edited time: 16 Dec, 2015 18:07
© Omar Sanadiki / Reuters
With two widely differing coalitions and one very complex Civil War, it would appear there is little room for compromise in Syria today. While Russia has called for a united front to fight terrorism in the country, Washington and its allies have very different and often contradictory plans.
CrossTalking with Ramzy Baroud, Mehmet Solmaz, and Gareth Porter.
Its available on "Sound Cloud" for those who can't get Lavelle's Show on RT because of "Buffering Issues."
https://soundcloud.com/rttv
BUT...if you have Great Internet Connection where YOU ARE then here's the link to see the show:
https://www.rt.com/shows/crosstalk/326074-syria-coalitions-civil-war/