Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Foreign Affairs
Related: About this forumProvocations at Sea: US Must Bear Cost of Any Mishap
http://watchingamerica.com/News/228630/provocations-at-sea-us-must-bear-cost-of-any-mishap/Just think for a moment on how the U.S. would react if Chinese warships tailed and monitored a U.S. carrier group in the Gulf of Mexico. Would they simply ignore it?
Provocations at Sea: US Must Bear Cost of Any Mishap
Wen Wei Po, Hong Kong
Translated By Nathan Hsu
17 December 2013
Edited by Phillip Shannon
Early this month, U.S. and Chinese warships nearly collided during a confrontation in the South China Sea. The encroachment of a U.S. naval vessel into the inner defense layer of a Chinese carrier group, as well as its interference in normal exercises conducted by [the Chinese] military, are provocations of an extremely inimical nature. China's power grows daily, and if a collision similar to the Hainan Island incident of over a decade ago occurs once more, the U.S. will have to bear the entire cost. Both the U.S. and China wish to build a new type of relationship between great powers, and both nations must accordingly deepen strategic cooperation, increase strategic trust and do their best to avoid friction.
The Chinese carrier group was en route to conduct military exercises in the South China Sea, and the international community had long since been informed of the area delineated for the operation. Under normal circumstances and with consideration for their own navigational safety, other nations' ships would not knowingly enter those waters. Even if they did enter, they would be required to steer clear of the course set by China's capital ship, as stipulated by international charters. Furthermore, despite the exercises being located on China's doorstep, the U.S. ship ignored Chinese warnings and brashly cut through and shadowed the Chinese column, on multiple occasions obstructing and harassing [the Chinese] ships. This was a blatant provocation that constituted a threat to the carrier group, and China's adoption of a measured response was well within the bounds of legality and reason. Just think for a moment on how the U.S. would react if Chinese warships tailed and monitored a U.S. carrier group in the Gulf of Mexico. Would they simply ignore it?
The fact is that U.S. warships and planes frequently hound Chinese military movements. This conduct is extremely disrespectful to China, infringes upon its rights and may trigger conflict in the future. The most apt example is the 2001 Hainan Island incident, in which two planes collided. Over a decade has passed since then. China's strength as a nation has grown immensely, and its military is striving to take the lead. In recent years, the U.S. has slumped into economic atrophy, and the sum of its power has waned while China's has risen. China now has even more strength to safeguard its dignity and interests.
The East and South China Seas are both sensitive regions that have a significant bearing on China's territorial sovereignty. Chinese naval activity in these regions is a statement and a powerful signal that China will defend its core interests. China has no desire to see other nations parading around on its doorstep. If the U.S. misreads the situation and persists in engaging in provocative behavior, the gravity of any mishap will far exceed that of the Hainan Island incident and come as a severe blow to U.S.-China relations. This can have no positive effect on amity between the two or, on a wider scope, global peace and stability. The U.S. will be the one that will bear the responsibility and the consequences.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 765 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Provocations at Sea: US Must Bear Cost of Any Mishap (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Dec 2013
OP
chervilant
(8,267 posts)1. The US would do well to overcome
its ridiculous Sinophobia (and its arrogant ethnocentrism).
gordianot
(15,245 posts)2. All the while China expands what they consider territorial waters.
There are so many contested areas with China it could happen about any where in the Pacific. Another case of uncontolled Capitalism.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)3. Very strong statement + sounds 'official'.
... This year, following the Annenberg Estate meeting between President Barack Obama and President Xi Jinping, the U.S. and China reached an important consensus on working together to establish a new type of relationship between great powers which is now steadily developing... The U.S. and China should strive toward general amicability and aligned interests by taking appropriate measures to manage differences of opinion and sensitive issues, reducing the risk of friction and conflict and benefiting the peoples of both nations and the entire world.