Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BootinUp

(47,164 posts)
Sat Nov 4, 2023, 03:31 PM Nov 2023

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (BootinUp) on Sun Nov 26, 2023, 10:51 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Think. Again.

(8,182 posts)
1. Thank you for posting this.
Sat Nov 4, 2023, 04:48 PM
Nov 2023

Beastly Boy

(9,373 posts)
2. Not "inherently" antisemitic. That's fair.
Sat Nov 4, 2023, 07:15 PM
Nov 2023

How about demonstrably antisemitic? When the intentions of an antisemite can be demonstrated to be antisemitic, can we bring it up as an example of antisemitism?

When someone says that "Israel and its defenders have long used this rhetorical tactic [ to shield Israel from accountability]", does this preclude Israel and its defenders from legitimately commenting on antisemitism because... tactics?

And if most of the world's Jews are presumed to have an ulterior motive when speaking about antisemitim, who is left to comment on antisemitism? Peter Beinart?

Response to Beastly Boy (Reply #2)

Beastly Boy

(9,373 posts)
4. I happen to fall into the category of "Israel and its supporters", which includes the vast majority of all Jews.
Sat Nov 4, 2023, 09:35 PM
Nov 2023

The statement is saying, quite literally, that the validity of my judgements on the subject of antisemitism, as well as that of others falling into the category of "Israel and their supporters", doesn't count and is proactively being condemned as being nefarious based exclusively on my affiliation with a certain group, not the strength of my argument.

So while they have no authority to prevent me from making my judgement, they are saying I cannot express my judgement without being accused of foul play, except when it gets their stamp of approval.

What they are probably not counting on is that I couldn't care less about their claim to any kind of an authority on the subject of antisemitism. And neither "Israel and its supporters".

Response to Beastly Boy (Reply #4)

Beastly Boy

(9,373 posts)
6. That is an understatement.
Sun Nov 5, 2023, 08:55 AM
Nov 2023

In the first paragraph of the statement, "Israel and its defenders", which by definition includes the vast majority of potential victims of antisemitism, are summarily accused of spreading the "narrative that any criticism of Israel is inherently antisemitic" and are preemptively judged guilty of all the sins listed in the following sentence. No Ifs, ands or buts about it.

Sounds pretty inclusive to me, and deliberately so. Being professional writers, the group cannot claim that their choice of words is unintentional.

Response to Beastly Boy (Reply #6)

Beastly Boy

(9,373 posts)
9. The subject of antisemitism may not be as controversioa from the liberal point
Sun Nov 5, 2023, 09:48 AM
Nov 2023

of view (depending on who gets to define "liberal" ), as it is from the point of view of antisemitism.

And people (including Jews on rare occasions) have been know to hold antisemitic views regardless of how high their social profile is.

Response to Beastly Boy (Reply #6)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»This message was self-del...