Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:40 AM Mar 2014

Europe reluctant to bolster militaries, despite threat

http://hamptonroads.com/2014/03/europe-reluctant-bolster-militaries-despite-threat

Europe reluctant to bolster militaries, despite threat
By Griff Witte
The Washington Post
© March 28, 2014

LONDON

After years of watching as defense cuts sliced away at the army he once led, Richard Dannatt decided Russia's thrust into Ukraine marked the right moment to start rebuilding the British military.

Dannatt, now a member of Parliament after an army career that spanned 38 years, this week sought to do just that with legislation that would have saved a brigade — or about 3,000 troops — in Britain's rapidly shriveling active-duty force.

But the modest bill was quickly nixed by the government, and on Tuesday Dannatt conceded defeat.

~snip~

President Barack Obama on Wednesday sought to coax his European allies to wake up to the renewed threat of Russia, and reinvest in militaries that have long gone fallow. But for the moment, there appears to be little appetite among European leaders to bust their recession-scarred budgets or buck their war-weary populations in order to shore up thinly stretched armed forces.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Europe reluctant to bolster militaries, despite threat (Original Post) unhappycamper Mar 2014 OP
yea, let us pay for it! oldandhappy Mar 2014 #1
Why can't a candidate get exboyfil Mar 2014 #3
Amen! oldandhappy Mar 2014 #5
Good, Britain can start by dis-amalgamating the regiments. malthaussen Mar 2014 #2
No, they'd rather plow their money into economic development, and let the US TwilightGardener Mar 2014 #4

exboyfil

(17,863 posts)
3. Why can't a candidate get
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 11:00 AM
Mar 2014

traction running on this. We spend twice the amount based on our GDP than our European or Asian allies (in some cases even shockingly more). If they don't take their own defense seriously, why should we.

The EU dwarves the Russian economy. The same with S. Korea and N. Korea. Combined the surrounding democracies still have a larger economy than China. They all need to spend more or get agreements in place for everyone to spend less.

malthaussen

(17,200 posts)
2. Good, Britain can start by dis-amalgamating the regiments.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:43 AM
Mar 2014

A modern travesty of military reform that should be undone.

-- Mal

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
4. No, they'd rather plow their money into economic development, and let the US
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 01:07 PM
Mar 2014

waste our money over there instead--free ride, as always.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Europe reluctant to bolst...