Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Sat May 24, 2014, 10:27 AM May 2014

IAEA assessment plan presents new hurdle in Iran nuclear talks

The United Nations is unlikely to complete its assessment of whether Iran has conducted research on nuclear weapons before the deadline set by six world powers for a deal to curb the country's nuclear activities, a new complication in the international negotiations.

In its latest quarterly report released Friday, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, said it would conduct a comprehensive "system assessment" of all evidence on the sensitive issue of whether Iran has sought to gain nuclear weapons capability.

The scope of the study probably means that the United States and the five other world powers won't have the U.N.'s final judgment on Iran's disputed activities by July 20, when they hope to have completed an agreement with Iran.

Instead, the world powers — the U.S., Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia — will have to determine whether Iran has sought nuclear weapons capability, adding a further challenge to a negotiation that is already difficult, said David Albright, a nuclear weapons specialist who is president of the Institute for Science and International Security.

http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-iran-iaea-20140524-story.html

Stall, stall, stall. I've got $5 that says the "world powers" will not agree about Iran's past intentions.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IAEA assessment plan presents new hurdle in Iran nuclear talks (Original Post) bemildred May 2014 OP
Iran addresses nuclear bomb allegations for first time: IAEA bemildred May 2014 #1
Iran could help themselves a great deal. ColesCountyDem May 2014 #2
"carte blanche" bemildred May 2014 #3
I'm aware of what it means. n/t ColesCountyDem May 2014 #4
I was referring to the spelling. nt bemildred May 2014 #5
Iran cuts uranium stock below N-arms level bemildred May 2014 #6
Iran finally providing details of its detonators bemildred May 2014 #7
"Iran’s Supreme Leader: Jihad Will Continue Until America is No More" ColesCountyDem May 2014 #8
Daily Caller? nt bemildred May 2014 #9
Either he said it, or he didn't. n/t ColesCountyDem May 2014 #10
I'm guessing that he didn't. bemildred May 2014 #11
'Guess' beng the operative word. n/t ColesCountyDem May 2014 #12
Quite, I don't read Farsi or whatever that is. bemildred May 2014 #13
It certainly requires an enormous leap of faith to believe that a 'nuclear ayatollah' could say that ColesCountyDem May 2014 #14
One can certainly tell the idea is attractive to some. bemildred May 2014 #15
One can also see why burying one's head in the sand is also attarctive to some. ColesCountyDem May 2014 #16
Glad to see you showing some self-reflection. bemildred May 2014 #17
It wasn't self-reflection, but if t makes you feel better to think so, so be it. ColesCountyDem May 2014 #18
Fear makes you dumb. You think we should all be afraid like you? nt bemildred May 2014 #19
I'm not afraid. ColesCountyDem May 2014 #22
Here is a second source for you: bemildred May 2014 #20
Your point being what? ColesCountyDem May 2014 #23
Iran says world powers are ‘demanding too much’ in nuke talks bemildred May 2014 #21

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
1. Iran addresses nuclear bomb allegations for first time: IAEA
Sat May 24, 2014, 11:31 AM
May 2014

VIENNA: Iran has for the first time in six years addressed concerns about the so-called “possible military dimensions” of its nuclear programme, a new International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report showed Friday.

Tehran handed over information related to detonators that can be used for several purposes but also for a nuclear weapon under a key November interim nuclear deal, the quarterly report, seen by AFP, showed.

In technical meetings with the United Nations (UN) atomic watchdog in late April and earlier this week in Iran, Tehran provided “information and explanations, including showing documents, to substantiate its stated need and application of EBW (Explosive Bridge Wire detonators),” the report by IAEA director-general Yukiya Amano for member states said.

“Iran showed information to the agency that simultaneous firing of EBW was tested for a civilian application,” it went on.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/712505/iran-addresses-nuclear-bomb-allegations-for-first-time-iaea/

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
2. Iran could help themselves a great deal.
Sat May 24, 2014, 11:32 AM
May 2014

Iran could just quit 'negotiating', and just give the IAEA carte blanc to its records, personnel, etc. . Sorry, but no pity party for the nuclear ayatollahs here.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
6. Iran cuts uranium stock below N-arms level
Sat May 24, 2014, 06:28 PM
May 2014

VIENNA (AP)—Iran has neutralized most of its stockpile of higher-enriched uranium that could be turned quickly into the core of a nuclear weapon, the U.N. nuclear agency said Friday, leaving the country with only about one-fifth of what it would need for such a purpose.

The International Atomic Energy Agency said in a confidential report that Iran now has less than 40 kilograms of the material. The report, obtained by The Associated Press, said Tehran also was meeting all other obligations under the agreement, reached four months ago as a prelude to a comprehensive deal now being negotiated.

Iran denies any interest in having atomic arms. But it is ending some nuclear activities and limiting others under a first-step plan implemented in January that gives it some sanctions relief in return for the concessions.

As part of the deal, Iran agreed to dilute or convert all of its stock of uranium enriched to 20 percent. At that level, uranium is only a technical step away from use as the core of a nuclear warhead.

http://the-japan-news.com/news/article/0001304912

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
7. Iran finally providing details of its detonators
Sat May 24, 2014, 06:31 PM
May 2014

For six years, international nuclear inspectors have been demanding that Iran turn over evidence of experiments that they suspect could have been part of a secret effort to solve the complex science of detonating a nuclear weapon.

On Friday, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the monitoring arm of the United Nations, said it was finally beginning to see the information it had long sought, but that Iran insisted the detonators were for non-nuclear purposes.

The disclosure was buried in a report by the atomic agency that detailed major progress Iran had made in diluting most of its stockpile of medium-enriched uranium, nuclear fuel that the West has long feared could be converted relatively quickly into weapons-grade material.

Getting Iran to dilute that uranium was perhaps the biggest single accomplishment of the interim deal struck last year, creating room for the current negotiations, which hit their first major roadblock last week.

http://www.watoday.com.au/world/iran-finally-providing-details-of-its-detonators-20140524-38vsa.html

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
8. "Iran’s Supreme Leader: Jihad Will Continue Until America is No More"
Sun May 25, 2014, 06:57 PM
May 2014

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, all but said on Sunday that negotiations over the country’s illicit nuclear program are over and that the Islamic Republic’s ideals include destroying America.

“Those (Iranians) who want to promote negotiation and surrender to the oppressors and blame the Islamic Republic as a warmonger in reality commit treason,” Khamenei told a meeting of members of parliament, according to the regime’s Fars News Agency.

Khamenei emphasized that without a combative mindset, the regime cannot reach its higher Islamic role against the “oppressors’ front.”

“The reason for continuation of this battle is not the warmongering of the Islamic Republic. Logic and reason command that for Iran, in order to pass through a region full of pirates, needs to arm itself and must have the capability to defend itself,” he said....

http://news.yahoo.com/iran-supreme-leader-jihad-continue-until-america-no-180230486.html

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
11. I'm guessing that he didn't.
Mon May 26, 2014, 09:08 AM
May 2014

But even if he did, I don't give a fuck. I have better things to do than wallow in hate for some senile old man on the other side of the world. He is Iran's problem, not mine. And the Daily Caller makes things up.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
13. Quite, I don't read Farsi or whatever that is.
Mon May 26, 2014, 09:48 AM
May 2014

But, to be fair, if you can come up with some other articles from News organizations that support that translation, I'll consider it is true. I just don't believe anything from Daily Caller on their say so.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
15. One can certainly tell the idea is attractive to some.
Mon May 26, 2014, 10:50 AM
May 2014

I don't see why though, as I said, he is a senile old man and not long for this world. Obsessing about his obsessions won't get you far.

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
16. One can also see why burying one's head in the sand is also attarctive to some.
Mon May 26, 2014, 11:31 AM
May 2014

Ignoring what is plainly stated rarely garners one 'insight' into a problem.

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
18. It wasn't self-reflection, but if t makes you feel better to think so, so be it.
Mon May 26, 2014, 11:53 AM
May 2014

I read quite widely, thank you very much. and across the entire political spectrum. Too bad that some feel the need to remain inside echo chambers.

If a man tells me to my face, "I'm going to kill you", I'm not so great a fool as to NOT believe him.

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
23. Your point being what?
Mon May 26, 2014, 05:51 PM
May 2014

As I said before, he either said it, or he did not say it. You have yet to refute the source(s) reporting that he did say it.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
21. Iran says world powers are ‘demanding too much’ in nuke talks
Mon May 26, 2014, 01:16 PM
May 2014

Iran said on Monday that world powers were “demanding too much” in negotiations aimed at reaching a deal on Tehran’s nuclear programme by a July deadline, but hurdles could be overcome.

Tehran and six world powers made little progress in the latest round of talks earlier this month in Vienna on ending their stand-off, raising doubts about the chances of a breakthrough by July 20.

Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, speaking in Tehran before a visit to Turkey for talks with European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton on ways of advancing the talks, said a compromise was still possible despite the difficulties.

“They should stop demanding too much. We have our red line, and they too want assurances that our nuclear programme will always remain peaceful. We believe these two add up,” the state news agency IRNA quoted Mr Zarif as saying on Monday.

http://www.thenational.ae/world/middle-east/iran-says-world-powers-are-demanding-too-much-in-nuke-talks

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»IAEA assessment plan pres...