Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

toddmiller

(75 posts)
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 07:14 PM Dec 2012

Why Diplomats Who Make Threats Should Rarely Be Trusted & Are Rarely Effective

According to theories of threat making, the way most leaders & politicians threaten other countries has nothing to do with changing the behavior of what your threatening. More often than not, it's a political ploy to make yourself appear to be a strong leader.

The problem with the strategy is that its destructive and I believe it keeps the war as opposed to promoting peace. It angers those who are threatened and it seldom gives reasonable ways for those threatened to extricate themselves from the situation which is a tell that the threat-maker is just chest thumping and really can't way what his countries true intentions are.

I think this sort of behavior perpetuates needless defense build ups and wars that are prepetuated by hatred. Yet, I also see that politically it works. People seem to like chest-thumping candidates so my question is what can be done to break this cycle?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Diplomats Who Make Threats Should Rarely Be Trusted & Are Rarely Effective (Original Post) toddmiller Dec 2012 OP
You need better people, as long as belligerence "works", politicians will keep doing it. nt bemildred Dec 2012 #1
We need more informed voters who are aware of these tricks as well. toddmiller Dec 2012 #2
That would be one part of having better people. bemildred Dec 2012 #3
can't understand why they don't teach informal logic, toddmiller Jan 2013 #4
I am cynical, I understand it perfectly. But I don't approve. bemildred Jan 2013 #5
well said toddmiller Jan 2013 #6

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
3. That would be one part of having better people.
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 09:41 AM
Dec 2012

They would know when they are being bullshitted or some clown is trying to manipulate them.

toddmiller

(75 posts)
4. can't understand why they don't teach informal logic,
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 10:39 AM
Jan 2013

propaganda and advertising tricks in school. It's not that complicated but so many are fooled by this stuff.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
5. I am cynical, I understand it perfectly. But I don't approve.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 01:51 PM
Jan 2013

If you have an authoritarian bent, the last thing you want is a bunch of people asking questions. You want obedience. And the world is full of people that want to be told what to do, to belong to a tribe or a club or a gang or a clan. That plays out everyday in our politics.

There is sort of a bootstrap problem, if you get enough people well enough educated and empowered, it becomes harder to reverse. Before then, it is relatively easy to drag us back into the Hobbesian mud with a bit of violence, xenophobia, and misdirection.

When I was a kid they still had civics classes and they were still trying to really educate us to compete with the commies. I have hidden under my school desk and kissed my ass goodbye. But they started vigorously dumbing it all back down after the Vietnam debacle. It was like we failed because they lost that stupid war. Correcting an "excess of democracy".

I think there is a large element of not wanting to pay for it too.

We are long past the point where we can afford to be dumb, or cheap.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Why Diplomats Who Make Th...