Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 08:03 PM Apr 2015

Israeli Right renews its fight on funding for human rights orgs

http://972mag.com/israeli-right-renews-its-fight-on-funding-for-human-rights-orgs/105989/

Legislative attacks on EU funding of human rights activities could backfire by forcing the Europeans to revisit the basis for its entire economic relationship with Israel — something that not even BDS has succeeded at accomplishing.


The Israeli Right is once again seeking to introduce legislation that would limit the ability of human rights and anti-occupation organizations to seek funding abroad. As part of coalition negotiations with Prime Minister Netanyahu, Naftali Bennett’s Jewish Home party is demanding that foreign-government funding of local institutions require approval by the Defense Ministry and the Knesset’s powerful Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee. The next government is unlikely to adopt Bennett’s demand as policy, but some softer version may very well reach the Knesset floor, and even gain the necessary majority to become law.

The Israeli Right is once again seeking to introduce legislation that would limit the ability of human rights and anti-occupation organizations to seek funding abroad. As part of coalition negotiations with Prime Minister Netanyahu, Naftali Bennett’s Jewish Home party is demanding that foreign-government funding of local institutions require approval by the Defense Ministry and the Knesset’s powerful Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee. The next government is unlikely to adopt Bennett’s demand as policy, but some softer version may very well reach the Knesset floor, and even gain the necessary majority to become law.

The Israeli Right is once again seeking to introduce legislation that would limit the ability of human rights and anti-occupation organizations to seek funding abroad. As part of coalition negotiations with Prime Minister Netanyahu, Naftali Bennett’s Jewish Home party is demanding that foreign-government funding of local institutions require approval by the Defense Ministry and the Knesset’s powerful Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee. The next government is unlikely to adopt Bennett’s demand as policy, but some softer version may very well reach the Knesset floor, and even gain the necessary majority to become law.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Israeli Right renews its fight on funding for human rights orgs (Original Post) R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 OP
a better way to deal with human rights organizations guillaumeb Apr 2015 #1
Again with the insane 'genocide' accusation. SMH. n/t shira Apr 2015 #2
One might argue that genocide is insanity. guillaumeb Apr 2015 #3
Didn't we have this discussion already? Hamas comes much closer... shira Apr 2015 #4
In the universe where I live, guillaumeb Apr 2015 #5
That's not a reality based universe you live in... shira Apr 2015 #6
Rhetoric and action are different things Scootaloo Apr 2015 #8
Let's 1st agree it's not genocidal for Israel to respond militarily to Hamas rockets. n/t shira Apr 2015 #9
and that is just the beginning RDO ..... Israeli Apr 2015 #7
Do you really not get it, or are you pretending not to get it? shira Apr 2015 #10
I would probably " get it " ..... Israeli Apr 2015 #11
Knew you would ignore the above shira :) Israeli Apr 2015 #12
+1. Jefferson23 May 2015 #15
kick .... Israeli May 2015 #13
Perhaps shira is asking for a lifeline right now? R. Daneel Olivaw May 2015 #14

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
1. a better way to deal with human rights organizations
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 08:14 PM
Apr 2015

would be for Israel to stop the genocide, stop stealing land, stop making war on children, and withdraw from the stolen land.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
3. One might argue that genocide is insanity.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 08:24 PM
Apr 2015

One might also argue that a refusal to face reality is also insanity.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
4. Didn't we have this discussion already? Hamas comes much closer...
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 08:26 PM
Apr 2015

....to meeting the criteria of being genocidal than Israel.

But you can't acknowledge that.

Why bring up the criteria in the 1st place if you're employing such a double-standard?

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
5. In the universe where I live,
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 08:34 PM
Apr 2015

it is Israel that has stolen most of Palestine. Israel that attacks hospitals, schools, and homes in Gaza. Israeli actions are often followed by Palestinian reactions.
A classic action/reaction situation, but in this case, the Palestinian reaction is condemned by you while the initial Israeli action is ignored.

But eventually reality has a way of intruding on even the most revisionist of historical fantasy.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
6. That's not a reality based universe you live in...
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 08:49 PM
Apr 2015
it is Israel that has stolen most of Palestine.


Palestine 100 years ago consisted of Jordan as well. That's around 75% of Palestine right there. How do you get that Israel has stolen most of Palestine? Aside from the fact Palestine has never been a sovereign state, with no Palestinian nationalist leaders, etc.

Israel that attacks hospitals, schools, and homes in Gaza.


Hamas shouldn't purposely use civilian areas to fire at Israel or store their weapons, hide their militants, etc. I know you don't agree b/c for some reason Hamas deserves a free pass from its war crimes and its obvious desire to maximize Palestinian casualties. Because Israel must be blamed while pretending Hamas has nothing to do with any Palestinian casualties.

Israeli actions are often followed by Palestinian reactions.


Like the Gaza war of 2014? 2012? 2009? Hamas' rocket barrages resulted from Israel doing...what?

You must be kidding.

A classic action/reaction situation, but in this case, the Palestinian reaction is condemned by you while the initial Israeli action is ignored.


You have cause and effect backwards.

But eventually reality has a way of intruding on even the most revisionist of historical fantasy.


Again, you brought up criteria for a realistic definition of genocide. You accused Israel of meeting the criteria even though Hamas is a MUCH better fit, and yet Hamas is not genocidal in your opinion. And you talk about revisionist, historical fantasy?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
8. Rhetoric and action are different things
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 10:45 AM
Apr 2015

You often seem confused by the distinction, so, consider yourself reminded.

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
7. and that is just the beginning RDO .....
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 07:23 AM
Apr 2015

....a perfect example of the worst of the worst IMHO of our old Right has had his say today on ynet ....
Elyakim Haetzni : ......

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4651083,00.html

Take a long hard look into who he perceives as the enemy .
Probably worthwhile doing a background check on his history with the settlement movement to


 

shira

(30,109 posts)
10. Do you really not get it, or are you pretending not to get it?
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 12:01 PM
Apr 2015

There are legitimate human rights groups and then there are others masquerading as human rights groups that only believe Palestinians have human rights. Jews do not.

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
11. I would probably " get it " .....
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 04:40 PM
Apr 2015

If ....you gave me a list of which ( in your opinion ) is which .

How about Yesh Din ......legitimate or not ?

Machsom Watch ?

B'Tselem ?

Bat Shalom ?

Physicians for Human Rights–Israel ?

Rabbis for Human Rights ?

Adalah – The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel ?

HaMoked ?

Ir Amim ?

Public Committee Against Torture in Israel ?

The above are among the " local institutions " mentioned below from the OP :

The Israeli Right is once again seeking to introduce legislation that would limit the ability of human rights and anti-occupation organizations to seek funding abroad. As part of coalition negotiations with Prime Minister Netanyahu, Naftali Bennett’s Jewish Home party is demanding that foreign-government funding of local institutions require approval by the Defense Ministry and the Knesset’s powerful Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee. The next government is unlikely to adopt Bennett’s demand as policy, but some softer version may very well reach the Knesset floor, and even gain the necessary majority to become law.

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
12. Knew you would ignore the above shira :)
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 01:50 PM
Apr 2015

Want another taste of what is just around the corner ........

MK says advocating for two-state solution is treason

Freshman Jewish Home MK Yinon Magal accuses a former Israeli Foreign Ministry director of committing a capital offense: advocating for a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

Right-wing elements in Israel have long claimed that the two-state solution is national suicide. Logically, it follows that advocating for such an outcome would constitute treason.

That was exactly the view espoused by former journalist and high-profile freshman Knesset Member Yinon Magal of Naftali Bennett’s Jewish Home party on Tuesday.

By advocating for a Palestinian state — with East Jerusalem as its capital — Liel is encouraging ceding “sovereign” territory that the world doesn’t recognize as Israel’s, to a “state” that Israel doesn’t recognize as existing. At least that is Magal’s logic.

“In addition to the fact that, in my opinion it is reckless behavior, it violates section 97(b) of the penal code,” Magal concluded.

Section 97(b) is the first subsection defining treason in the Israeli penal code.

If a person commits an act liable to remove any area from the sovereignty of the State or to place it under the sovereignty of a foreign state with the intention to bring that about, then he is liable to the death penalty or to life imprisonment.

Magal clarifies that he does not think Liel should be sentenced to death, but is adamant that he has committed treason — for advancing the two-state solution.

Because of the drawn-out process of forming a new coalition there have not been many opportunities for freshman MKs to make headlines since the elections. But it is indicative of the type of rhetoric we can expect to see over the next four years in the fourth Netanyahu government.

Source: http://972mag.com/mk-says-advocating-for-a-two-state-solution-is-treason/106052/

The Two State Solution is over .....its done its dead .

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Israeli Right renews its ...