Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumSupreme Court allows state to replace Bedouin village with Jewish one
Israel's Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a petition by residents of the unrecognized Bedouin village of Umm al-Hiran against their removal and the demolition of the community in order to construct a new town for Jewish residents in its place. The court ruled the land belongs to the state and the Bedouins have no legal rights to it.
The state is the owner of the lands in dispute, which were registered in its name in the framework of the arrangement process; the residents have acquired no rights to the land but have settled them [without any authorization], which the state cancelled legally. In such a situation, there is no justification for intervention in the rulings of the previous courts, wrote Supreme Court Justice Elyakim Rubinstein in the majority opinion.
Rubinstein ruled that the appeal should be rejected for two reasons: First, because the petition was an indirect attack against the decisions of the governments establishment of the new community of Hiran, to be built on the state-owned land a challenge that should have been raised in other forums. Second, the judges ruled the governments actions did not in any way violate the petitioners legal rights and even if such rights were harmed, it was a proportionate harm.
The Supreme Court decision concerns only the evacuation orders. The Kiryat Gat Magistrates Court is scheduled to hold a hearing at the end of this month about the demolition orders for the houses in Umm al-Hiran.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel/1.655145
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 835 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court allows state to replace Bedouin village with Jewish one (Original Post)
azurnoir
May 2015
OP
Must be nice for the state..here ya go, it's legal...totally twisted, but legal. n/t
Jefferson23
May 2015
#1
The residents of the village were re-located there in the '50's so that a kibbutz could be built on
azurnoir
May 2015
#2
Only citizens with full (Jewish) citizenship can live legally on Israeli state lands.
Little Tich
May 2015
#6
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)1. Must be nice for the state..here ya go, it's legal...totally twisted, but legal. n/t
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)2. The residents of the village were re-located there in the '50's so that a kibbutz could be built on
the site of their original village. what was that about Israel's non-Jewish population having equal rights?
As it happens, Umm al-Hiram stands on the site of one of 10 new Jewish settlements the Prime Ministers Office seeks to build in the area. In 2010, a state zoning committee recommended recognizing Umm al-Hiran, but Prime Minister Netanyahus office overruled that decision. The new settlement, called Hiran, will offer housing subsidies for national-religious families.
The Bedouin in this village have an especially strong case, since they were sent there by the state of Israel itself. Following the 1948 war, members of the Abu Al-Qian tribe were evicted from their lands in the western Negev (currently the site of Kibbutz Shoval). After settling in a temporary site, they were sent in the mid-50s by the military governor who was put in charge of the Palestinian population after the war to the Yatir area, where they currently live.
The Bedouin in this village have an especially strong case, since they were sent there by the state of Israel itself. Following the 1948 war, members of the Abu Al-Qian tribe were evicted from their lands in the western Negev (currently the site of Kibbutz Shoval). After settling in a temporary site, they were sent in the mid-50s by the military governor who was put in charge of the Palestinian population after the war to the Yatir area, where they currently live.
http://972mag.com/bedouin-village-in-negev-to-be-destroyed-jewish-settlement-to-be-built-on-site/56875/
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)3. Separate but equal. n/t
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)4. "As it happens"?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)5. That can't be true. Hasbara Hilda says
there's no such thing as Jewish only settlements.
Little Tich
(6,171 posts)6. Only citizens with full (Jewish) citizenship can live legally on Israeli state lands.
Ethnic cleansing is immoral, even if its legal and ordered by a court.