Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
Wed May 6, 2015, 03:04 PM May 2015

Supreme Court allows state to replace Bedouin village with Jewish one



Israel's Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a petition by residents of the unrecognized Bedouin village of Umm al-Hiran against their removal and the demolition of the community – in order to construct a new town for Jewish residents in its place. The court ruled the land belongs to the state and the Bedouins have no legal rights to it.

“The state is the owner of the lands in dispute, which were registered in its name in the framework of the arrangement process; the residents have acquired no rights to the land but have settled them [without any authorization], which the state cancelled legally. In such a situation, there is no justification for intervention in the rulings of the previous courts,” wrote Supreme Court Justice Elyakim Rubinstein in the majority opinion.

Rubinstein ruled that the appeal should be rejected for two reasons: First, because the petition was an indirect attack against the decisions of the government’s establishment of the new community of Hiran, to be built on the state-owned land – a challenge that should have been raised in other forums. Second, the judges ruled the government’s actions did not in any way violate the petitioners’ legal rights – and even if such rights were harmed, it was a “proportionate harm.”

The Supreme Court decision concerns only the evacuation orders. The Kiryat Gat Magistrate’s Court is scheduled to hold a hearing at the end of this month about the demolition orders for the houses in Umm al-Hiran.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel/1.655145
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court allows state to replace Bedouin village with Jewish one (Original Post) azurnoir May 2015 OP
Must be nice for the state..here ya go, it's legal...totally twisted, but legal. n/t Jefferson23 May 2015 #1
The residents of the village were re-located there in the '50's so that a kibbutz could be built on azurnoir May 2015 #2
Separate but equal. n/t Jefferson23 May 2015 #3
"As it happens"? Scootaloo May 2015 #4
That can't be true. Hasbara Hilda says R. Daneel Olivaw May 2015 #5
Only citizens with full (Jewish) citizenship can live legally on Israeli state lands. Little Tich May 2015 #6

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
2. The residents of the village were re-located there in the '50's so that a kibbutz could be built on
Wed May 6, 2015, 03:47 PM
May 2015

the site of their original village. what was that about Israel's non-Jewish population having equal rights?

As it happens, Umm al-Hiram stands on the site of one of 10 new Jewish settlements the Prime Minister’s Office seeks to build in the area. In 2010, a state zoning committee recommended recognizing Umm al-Hiran, but Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office overruled that decision. The new settlement, called Hiran, will offer housing subsidies for national-religious families.

The Bedouin in this village have an especially strong case, since they were sent there by the state of Israel itself. Following the 1948 war, members of the Abu Al-Qian tribe were evicted from their lands in the western Negev (currently the site of Kibbutz Shoval). After settling in a temporary site, they were sent in the mid-50s by the military governor – who was put in charge of the Palestinian population after the war – to the Yatir area, where they currently live.


http://972mag.com/bedouin-village-in-negev-to-be-destroyed-jewish-settlement-to-be-built-on-site/56875/

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
6. Only citizens with full (Jewish) citizenship can live legally on Israeli state lands.
Thu May 7, 2015, 02:20 AM
May 2015

Ethnic cleansing is immoral, even if it’s legal and ordered by a court.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Supreme Court allows stat...